PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN DOKTER FORENSIK DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN VISUM ET REPERTUM

R. Aj Dwi Sukmaningru  Hayati; Made  Warka

doi:10.53363/bureau.v3i2.263

Authors

R. Aj Dwi Sukmaningru Hayati Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Made Warka Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i2.263

Keywords:

Pertanggungjawaban Dokter, Visum Et Repertum, Pemalsuan, Doctor's Responsibility, Forgery, Warka

Abstract

In the case of a post mortem investigation, it is very important to have it as a complement to the evidence of a case, as well as the family of the victim, which is used to complement the evidence of a case and reveal a case, which with the help of experts can make it easier in terms of handling which authority What is given to investigators is a law aimed at submitting expert testimony. The situation of Visum Et Repertum can be said to be important which is to overcome legal problems, namely the obstacles that occur, namely for investigators to be able to immediately make a request letter for Visum Et Repertum to victims who are asked to the doctor if there are victims who need to be asked for Visum Et Repertum to be examined immediately and preferably, for the family it is hoped that they can give permission to do a post-mortem for the purposes of investigation, and for the hospital so that the making of Visum Et Repertum can run smoothly. The purpose of this research is to find out the responsibility of the forensic doctor in the criminal act of counterfeiting in visum et repertum. In this study, using normative juridical methods were examined with library data which included primary and secondary laws

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agung, S. (2008). Tinjauan Tentang KejahataN. Tinjauan Tentang Kejahatan, 21.

Aurelia, A. N., & Mahmud, A. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Hasil Visum et Repertum Ditinjau dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Jo UU No. 36 …. Bandung Conference Series …, 36, 555–560.

Hanna Wijaya, I. H. (2021). TINDAKAN PEMALSUAN SURAT KETERANGAN DOKTER. TINDAKAN PEMALSUAN SURAT KETERANGAN DOKTER, 26(2), 173–180.

Hertina, M. F. (2019). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Kedudukan Visum Et Repertum dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana di Pengadilan. 1–25.

I Kadek Suar Putra Dana, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, & I Made Minggu Widyantara. (2021). Sanksi Pidana terhadap Tenaga Medis yang Melakukan Pemalsuan Surat Keterangan Rapid Test Covid 19. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 2(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.1.3091.53-58

Kawenas, J. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Kejahatan Di Bidang Kesehatan. Lex Crimen, 8(8), 31–38.

Library, U. I. (2006). Penanganan akibat bencana luapan lumpur panas PT . Lapindo Barantas di Kecamatan Porong oleh Polres Sidoarjo.

Monita, Y., & Wahyudhi, D. (2013). Peranan Dokter Forensik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana. 6(7), 127–141.

Nuralinda, Z., & Arafat, M. R. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban hukum pidana terhadap pelaku pemalsuan alat bukti. 37(2), 205–211.

Pembunuhan, P., Sudarso, J. Y., & Timur, J. (2018). Jurnal IUS Vol.VI No.02 September 2018. 02, 43–62.

PRIYANTO, H. (2019). Pembuatan Visum Et Repertum Oleh Dokter Sebagai Upaya Mengungkap Perkara Di Dalam Proses Peradilan. Jurnal Idea Hukum, 5(1), 1316–1331. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jih.2019.5.1.107

Rozaliyani, A., Meilia, P. D. I., & Libritany, N. (2018). Prinsip Penetapan Sanksi bagi Pelanggaran Etik Kedokteran. Jurnal Etika Kedokteran Indonesia, 2(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.26880/jeki.v2i1.11

Semara Ratih, G. A. N. A. D., & Purwani, S. P. M. E. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pemalsuan Rekam Medis Oleh Tenaga Medis. Kertha Wicara?: Journal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 8 No 8 (2019), 1–15.

U, N. A., & Salenda, K. (2021). Peranan Visum Et Repertum dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Perspektif Hukum Islam di Pengadilan Negeri Sungguminasa. Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i3.21462

Yeremia Eddy Toar Rayer, Roy V. Karamoy, C. S. T. (2005). SANKSI HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU PEMALSUAN HASIL AUTOPSI MENURUT PASAL 263 DAN PASAL 267 AYAT (1) KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA. 1.