HUKUM GUGUR KARENA TIGA HAL

Authors

  • Sarino Sarino Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
  • Wiwik Aswanti Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i3.799

Keywords:

law, power, demonstrations

Abstract

This research discusses the relationship between law, power, and social resistance. The background of the research shows that a number of policies and legislative products? are considered not pro-people?and tend to benefit the rulers and businessmen, while the space for public participation in the law-making process is largely closed. The purpose of this study is to analyze the causes of the decline in the effectiveness of the law and the role of demonstrations and a means of socio-political correction, The method used is juridical normative with a study of related theories, concept, doctines, and legislation.

The results of the study show that laws can be “overturned” or lose their legitimacy due to three main factor : (1) the law itself – reflected in problematic substance and prosedures as well as the judicial review decisions of the Constitutional Court; (2) power – political influence on the formation and amendment of laws, resulting in the laws often functioning as political tools; and (3) riots of demonstrations – historical mass actions have proven effective in driving social and legal change (e.g., the proclamation of independence, the 1998 reform, the labor movement).

The conclusion emphasizes that changing the law requires a combination of political effort, legal mechanisms, and mass mobilization. The recommendations stress the importance of public participation in the legislative process, the use of available legal channel, and the strengthening of social movements as the corrective to policies that harm the people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bambang Sunggono, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada,2016) h. 93

Kelsen, General Theory, Op. Cit. H.3. Kelsen, Pure Theory, Op.Cit, h.30-31, Op.cit Prof. Dr. Jumlu Asshiddiqie, SH., Dr. M. Ali Safa’at, SH., MH. Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum h. 13

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1999, h. 22

Ellydar Chaidir, Negara Hukum, Demokrasi dan Konstalasi Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Kreasi Total Media, Yogyakarta, 2007, hlm. 40.

Dosen Sosiologi.com “Pengertian Proletar, Tokoh, Ciri dan Contohnya” – 20 Juni 2023

Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang Undang Kerja Nomor 12 Tahun 1948

Undang Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 Tentang kemerdekaan menyampaikan pendapat dimuka umum

Undang Undang No. 13 tahun 2003 Tentang ketenagakerjaan

Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2004

Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 Tentang Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial

PP No 101 tahun 2012 tentang Penerima Bantuan Iuran (PBI)

Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2000 tentang Cipta Kerja

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023

Prof. Dr. Jimly Asshiddiqie, SHI., Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia

https://theconversation.com/selain-cipta-kerja-ada-tiga-omnibus-law-lain-yang-menunggu-disahkan-apa-layak-diteruskan-148009 16 Okt2020

Pemimpin, Pejabat, Dan Penguasa (https://uin-malang.ac.id/)

Sarino, SH., MH.(25 Maret 2025), Hukum Gugur Karena 3 Hal, https://www.koranperdjoeangan.com/hukum-gugur-karena-3-hal/

Wiwik Aswanti, SH., MH. (8 April 2025), Sejarah Demonstrasi, Mengapa Unjuk Rasa Perlu Dilakukan. https://www.koranperdjoeangan.com/sejarah-demonstrasi-mengapa-unjuk-rasa-perludilakukan/

https://www.gramedia.com/literasi/teori-kekuasaan/

Pengertian Rakyat Menurut Para Ahli, Elemen, dan Ketentuannya (https:// www.kompas.com)

Kronologi Kasus Tom Lembong: Disidik Menjelang Pilpres, Dibebaskan Prabowo 01/08/2025 diakses pada 4 Oktober 2025 https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/08/01/08130231/kronologi-kasus-tom-lembong-disidik-menjelang-pilpres-dibebaskan-prabowo?page=all

Downloads

Published

2025-10-10

How to Cite

Sarino, S., & Aswanti, W. (2025). HUKUM GUGUR KARENA TIGA HAL. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 5(3), 3086–3103. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i3.799