KEWENANGAN KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM PENGUSULAN PENGANGKATAN HAKIM AGUNG DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PASAL 71 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2014

Dini Inasyah  Alfaridah; Dina Aisyah  Alfarijah

doi:10.53363/bureau.v5i3.796

Authors

Dini Inasyah Alfaridah Universitas BSI Jakarta
Dina Aisyah Alfarijah Universitas BSI Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i3.796

Keywords:

Komisi Yudisial, Hakim Agung, DPR RI, Independensi Peradilan, Judicial Commission, Supreme Court Justice, House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia, Judicial Independence

Abstract

This study examines the ineffectiveness of the authority of the Judicial Commission in proposing the appointment of supreme court justices due to the practice of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia which is still conducting a fit and proper test, even though the Constitutional Court Decision Number 27/PUU-XI/2013 has limited the authority of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia to give approval. This has led to politicization in the process of appointing supreme court justices which has the potential to disrupt the independence of the judiciary. The purpose of this study is to analyze the mechanism of consideration of the House of Representatives in giving approval to candidates for supreme court justices, the existence of the Judicial Commission in proposing supreme court justices, and the effectiveness of the implementation of the authority of the Judicial Commission in relation to Article 71 of Law Number 17 of 2014. The research method uses a qualitative approach with a normative juridical method. Data was collected through literature studies and interviews, then analyzed descriptively analytically. The results of the study show that: (1) the consideration mechanism of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia still refers to old provisions that are contrary to the Constitutional Court's decision; (2) the existence of the Judicial Commission can be strengthened through the implementation of the Constitutional Court's decision No. 27/PUU-XI/2013; (3) the effectiveness of the implementation of the authority of the Judicial Commission is considered ineffective because Article 71 of the MD3 Law in practice still opens up room for political intervention. It is necessary to improve regulations and strengthen the authority of the Judicial Commission to realize the appointment of independent and qualified supreme court judges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2013.

———. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Yudisial.

Abdullah, Mustafa. “Kewenangan Mengusulkan Calon Hakim Agung.” Jurnal Komisi Yudisial (2020).

Assegaf, Rifkqi S. “Urgensi Komisi Yudisial dalam Pembaharuan Peradilan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Jentera 2 (2004): 5.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2012. Perkembangan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2013. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Budiardjo, Miriam. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2005.

Chase, Harold W. 1972. Federal Judges: The Appointing Process. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Falaakh, M. Fajrul. “———.” Kompas, 17 Mei 2013, 4.

Falaakh, M. Fajrul. 2013. "Rekrutmen Hakim Agung dan Independensi Peradilan." Kompas, 17 Mei 2013.

Friedman, Lawrence M. 1975. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Yudisial.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang MPR, DPR, DPD, dan DPRD.

Ismail. “Keterlibatan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dalam Pengisian Jabatan Hakim Agung dan Hakim Konstitusi ditinjau dari Perspektif Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Jurnal Ganec Swara 16, no. 1 (2022).

Isra, Saldi. 2015. Sistem Rekrutmen Dan Pengangkatan Hakim Agung dan Hakim Konstitusi dalam Konsepsi Negara Hukum. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI.

Isra, Saldi. Sistem Rekrutmen dan Pengangkatan Hakim Agung dan Hakim Konstitusi dalam Konsepsi Negara Hukum. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2015.

Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. “Hasil Seleksi Hakim Agung 2014–2022.”

Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Komisi Yudisial Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 tentang Seleksi Calon Hakim Agung.

Mahfud MD, Moh. Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi. Depok: Rajawali Press, 2017.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. 2013. Putusan Nomor 27/PUU-XI/2013 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2009 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2011.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 27/PUU-XI/2013.

Manan, Bagir. Membedah UUD 1945. Malang: UB Press, 2012.

Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. Lembaga Negara Independen. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2016.

Pawana, I Ketut Bayu. “Kewenangan DPR RI dalam Uji Kepatutan dan Kelayakan bagi Calon Pejabat Publik dari Aspek Ketatanegaraan.” Jurnal IPDN Kampus NTB 2 (2014): 214.

Transparency International. 2017. Global Corruption Report: Transparency in Judicial Systems. London: Transparency International Press.

Tutik, Titik Triwulan. Eksistensi Kedudukan dan Wewenang Komisi Yudisial. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2011.

Wiriadinata, Wahyu. “Komisi Yudisial dan Pengawasan Hakim di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 44, no. 4 (2013).