INOVASI DALAM KEBIJAKAN DAN REGULASI PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN DI INDONESIA

Yusup Suparman; Tuti Elawati

doi:10.53363/bureau.v5i1.784

Authors

Yusup Suparman Universitas Sains Indonesia
Tuti Elawati Universitas Sains Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i1.784

Keywords:

omnibus law, LPSK, regulatory innovation, restorative justice, witness and victim protection

Abstract

This study examines innovations in policies and regulations regarding witness and victim protection in Indonesia, with a focus on strengthening the legal framework, institutional capacity, and implementation within the criminal justice system. The Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK), as a non-ministerial government body, plays a strategic role in ensuring justice but continues to face challenges such as weak institutional structure, limited human resources, inadequate facilities and funding, and suboptimal use of information technology. This research employs a normative juridical approach complemented by limited empirical analysis of regulations, institutions, and policy implementation. The findings highlight the urgency of reforming witness and victim protection through revising Law No. 31 of 2014 using an omnibus law approach, formulating a grand design for witness and victim protection 2025–2045, establishing a dedicated trust fund, and developing restorative justice-based protection clinics. Furthermore, optimizing legal structures, enhancing regulatory quality, strengthening legal culture, and advancing digitalization through the national one-data system and electronic-based government system (SPBE) are key strategies. In conclusion, innovation in witness and victim protection policies and regulations in Indonesia must be directed toward institutional strengthening, improving civil service competence toward smart ASN, and ensuring sustainable funding to establish a modern, inclusive, and just national legal system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggriani Jum, Hukum Administrasi Negara, (Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2012).

Ardiwisastra Yudha Bhakti, “Imunitas Kedaulatan Negara di Forum Pengadilan Asing”, (Bandung: Alumni, 1999).

_____________________, Hukum Internasional (Bandung: Alumni, 2003).

Asshiddiqie Jimly, Gagasan Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Konstitusi dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia (Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru, 1994).

______________, Kemerdekaan Berserikat Pembubaran Partai Politik dan Mahkamah Konstitusi, (Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005).

Eko Noer Kristiyanto, Implementasi Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah Dalam Pengalokasian Dana APBD Kepada Klub Sepak Bola Peserta Liga Indonesia, (Bandung: UNPAD, 2008).

Foster Ken, Is There a Global Sports Law? Entertaintment Law, vol.2 No.1, London Spring 2003.

Goodin Robert R, Responsibility Right & Welfare, The Theory of the Welfare State, (Colorado: Westview Press, 1988).

Manan Bagir, “Penelitian Terapan di Bidang Hukum”, makalah, disampaikan pada Lokakarya Peranan Naskah Akademis Dalam Penyusunan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, BPHN, Jakarta, 9 – 11 November 1993.

Marzuki Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2010).

Pandjaitan Hinca IP, “Kedaulatan Negara VS Kedaulatan FIFA”, (Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2011)

Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001).

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.

Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2022 tentang Keolahragaan

Yamin Muhammad, Naskah Persiapan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Tahun 1945, (Jakarta: Jajasan Prapantja, 1960).