DAMPAK HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN PASCA OMNIBUS LAW DILANJUT PASCA PUTUSAN MK NO. 168/PUU-XXI/2023 TERHADAP PEKERJA

Authors

  • Wiwik Aswanti Federasi Serikat Pekerja Metal Indonesia
  • Hari Damono Federasi Serikat Pekerja Metal Indonesia
  • Sarino Federasi Serikat Pekerja Metal Indonesia
  • Mohamat Indrayana Federasi Serikat Pekerja Metal Indonesia
  • Heru Purdiyanto Federasi Serikat Pekerja Metal Indonesia
  • Noto Antoko Federasi Serikat Pekerja Metal Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i3.759

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Labor Laws, Omnibus Law, Workers

Abstract

Labor laws play an important role in ensuring legal certainty and a balance of rights and obligations between workers and employers. However, the enactment of the Job Creation Law (Omnibus Law) has sparked controversy because it is considered to accommodate the interests of employers and investors more than those of workers. This study examines the impact of the Job Creation Law and Constitutional Court Decision No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023 on the conditions of workers and industrial relations in Indonesia. Using a normative legal research method, this paper highlights changes in aspects of worker protection, including termination of employment, wages, severance pay, outsourcing, and apprenticeships. On the other hand, the role of labor unions as a means of fighting for workers' rights faces strategic challenges that encourage their involvement in the political arena. The results of the analysis show that the implementation of the Omnibus Law has created legal uncertainty and weakened the bargaining position of workers. Therefore, more equitable and inclusive labor regulations are needed, which are not drafted using the omnibus method. In conclusion, ideal labor laws must be able to create harmonious and equitable industrial relations for the welfare of workers, business sustainability, and social stability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, M. (2020). Omnibus Law dalam Perspektif Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Jakarta: Pustaka Nasional.

Amir, I., & Simanjuntak, R. (2021). Analisis Dampak Omnibus Law terhadap Perlindungan Pekerja di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan, 10(1), 45-67.

Cahyono, K. S. (2018, April 2). Konsep, Lobi, Aksi, dan Politik. Diakses pada 11 September 2025, dari https://www.koranperdjoeangan.com/konsep-lobi-aksi-dan-politik/.

Hasibuan, M. (2019). Serikat Pekerja dan Perjuangan Hak Pekerja dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Jurdi, F. (2017). Logika Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2023). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Diakses dari www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

Nasution, B. J. (2008). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Pasal 1 UU No. 13/2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.

Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 21/2009.

Sahbani, A. (2022, February 11). Jenis Putusan MK dalam Praktik Peradilan Konstitusi. Diakses pada 12 September 2025, dari https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/jenis-putusan-mk--lt62055c2421edf/.

Sarmadani, B. D. J. G., & Fahroji. (n.d.). Perbedaan Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan dan RUU Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja.

Soekanto, S. (2005). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Sujanto, H. (2022). Perubahan Sistem Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia pasca-Omnibus Law: Dampak terhadap Pekerja dan Pengusaha. Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan, 15(2), 112-131.

Surya, S. (2020). Omnibus Law: Mengungkap Kepentingan Politik dalam Pembentukan Regulasi Ketenagakerjaan. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbitan Fakultas Hukum.

UU No. 11/2020 tentang Cipta Kerja.

UU No. 13/2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-09

How to Cite

Aswanti, W., Damono, H., Sarino, S., Indrayana, M., Purdiyanto, H., & Antoko, N. (2025). DAMPAK HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN PASCA OMNIBUS LAW DILANJUT PASCA PUTUSAN MK NO. 168/PUU-XXI/2023 TERHADAP PEKERJA. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 5(3), 2748–2757. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i3.759