ANALISIS YURIDIS TENTANG GUGATAN TIDAK DAPAT DIEKSEKUSI (NON-EXECUTABLE) DALAM  PUTUSAN NOMOR  : 23/Pdt.GS/2023/PN Idm

Mardi Jaya; Wahyu Prawesti; Fitri Ayuningtiyas; Sri Sukmana Damayanti

doi:10.53363/bureau.v5i3.728

Authors

Mardi Jaya Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Wahyu Prawesti Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Fitri Ayuningtiyas Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Sri Sukmana Damayanti Universitas Dr. Soetomo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i3.728

Keywords:

gugatan sederhana, putusan perdata, non-executable, eksekusi, perlindungan hukum

Abstract

Court decisions in civil cases should provide legal certainty and restoration of rights for the winning party. However, in practice, decisions that cannot be enforced (non-executable) are often found, resulting in substantive justice failing to be realised. This phenomenon raises serious questions about the effectiveness of the judicial system, particularly in the context of dispute resolution through simple lawsuit mechanisms. This study stems from the urgency to examine the problem of unenforceable judgments, focusing on Judgment Number 23/Pdt.GS/2023/PN.Idm, in which, although the breach of contract lawsuit was granted, the verdict was not condemnatory, so enforcement could not be carried out. The main objective of this study is to analyse the legal provisions regarding unenforceable lawsuits and assess the extent to which the decision provides legal protection for the plaintiff. The research questions focus on two things, namely how the law regulates non-executable decisions and whether Decision Number 23/Pdt.GS/2023/PN.Idm has fulfilled the principle of legal protection. The research method used a normative legal approach with a case law approach. The primary legal materials were laws and regulations and court decisions, while the secondary legal materials included legal literature and expert opinions. Data was collected through literature study and analysed qualitatively with an emphasis on legal interpretation and systematic logic. The results of the study show that non-executable decisions are generally caused by weaknesses in declarative decisions, ambiguity in the subject matter of the dispute, or the subject matter being tied to a third party. The Indramayu case confirms the gap between formal legality and substantive justice. The conclusion of the study emphasises the need for clear and operational formulation of verdicts, evaluation of simple lawsuit regulations, and an increased role for judges and advocates in ensuring the effectiveness of legal protection. Further research is recommended to examine similar cases across regions to identify national patterns

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arzani, R. (2018). Analisis yuridis putusan declaratoir dalam perkara perdata. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Chakim, L. (2016). Fungsi putusan pengadilan dalam sistem peradilan perdata Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 23(1), 45–61.

Harahap, Y. (1995). Hukum acara perdata tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian, dan putusan pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hapsari, D. (2018). Eksekusi putusan perdata dan hambatannya. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Indonesia. (2019). Herzien Indonesisch Reglement (HIR). Jakarta: Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.

Jebabun, F., et al. (2018). Kekuatan eksekutorial putusan perdata: Analisis atas putusan non-executable. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 120–136.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (n.d.). KBBI daring. Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id

Latifa, N. (2015). Pelaksanaan eksekusi putusan perdata di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Natasya, F. (2025). Analisis terhadap putusan pengadilan yang tidak dapat dilakukan eksekusi (Non-Executable) ditinjau menurut norma kepastian hukum dan Pasal 145–224 HIR [Skripsi, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh].

Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 292.

Pujiandini, R. (2022). Kepastian hukum terhadap penggugat dalam pelaksanaan putusan yang dinyatakan non-executable (Studi Putusan Nomor 1/Pdt.G.S/2021/PN Metro) [Skripsi, Universitas Bandar Lampung].

Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Republik Indonesia. (2007). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Republik Indonesia. (2009a). Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157.

Republik Indonesia. (2009b). Undang-Undang Nomor 49 Tahun 2009 tentang Peradilan Umum. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 158.

Republik Indonesia. (2011). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 tentang Tata Cara Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI.

Setyawati, R. (2023). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia: Teori dan praktik eksekusi putusan. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Syarifuddin, M. (2020). Penyelesaian perkara perdata melalui gugatan sederhana: Implementasi dan tantangan. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(2), 155–172.