PRINSIP KONSISTENITAS PENGENDALIAN MASSA  DALAM TRAGEDI STADION KANJURUHAN TAHUN 2022

Dimas Chrysdianto; Dudik Djaja  Sidarta; Fathul Hamdani; Sri Sukmana Damayanti

doi:10.53363/bureau.v5i2.719

Authors

Dimas Chrysdianto Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Dudik Djaja Sidarta Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Fathul Hamdani Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Sri Sukmana Damayanti Universitas Dr. Soetomo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i2.719

Keywords:

Crowd Control, Police, Kanjuruhan Tragedy, Human Rights, Criminal Law

Abstract

The Kanjuruhan Stadium tragedy on 1 October 2022 was one of the darkest events in Indonesian sporting history, claiming hundreds of lives. This incident raises serious questions about the consistency of the police's application of crowd control principles as stipulated in Perkap No. 16 of 2006 and its compatibility with Article 359 of the Criminal Code. This study aims to answer two main questions: how did the police handle crowd control during the tragedy, and to what extent did their actions conflict with the national legal framework and human rights principles? This study uses a normative legal approach supported by sociological analysis. Primary data was obtained through interviews with police officers at the Malang Police Station and field observations, while secondary data was collected through a review of legislation, academic literature, and previous research. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively using inductive, deductive, and comparative methods to assess the gap between legal norms and field practices. The results of the study show that police actions were dominated by a repressive approach, particularly the use of tear gas, which triggered mass panic and caused a large number of casualties. These actions were not in line with the principles of proportionality, legality, and accountability as stipulated in Perkap No. 16 of 2006 and contradicted international standards on crowd control. Challenges in coordination among stakeholders, weak risk management, and the absence of emergency medical services further exacerbated the impact of the tragedy. This study concludes that the Kanjuruhan tragedy reflects institutional failure in the implementation of law and human rights protection. These findings imply the need for more humanistic crowd control policy reforms, based on human rights, as well as the integration of risk management in the organisation of public events. Further research is recommended to adopt a multidisciplinary approach encompassing legal, psychological, and crisis management aspects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Awang, M., Arifin, R., & Yulianto, B. (2024). Usut tuntas tragedi Stadion Kanjuruhan: Perspektif hukum dan HAM. Jurnal Hukum dan HAM, 12(1), 45–60.

Dwi, A. P. (2024). Penolakan revisi UU Pilkada: Analisis gerakan mahasiswa. Jurnal Politik dan Pemerintahan, 8(2), 112–125.

Enggalani, D., & Suratman, S. (2024). Peran kepolisian dalam tragedi Stadion Kanjuruhan: Tinjauan yuridis. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(1), 78–93.

Ika Yuliana, & Irma Istihara. (2023). Eksistensi negosiator dalam penanganan unjuk rasa berdasarkan Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 16 Tahun 2006 tentang Pedoman Pengendalian Massa. Jurnal Hukum, 9(2), 134–148.

Iswan, S., Rahman, T., & Kurniawan, H. (2024). Efektivitas pelaksanaan Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 16 Tahun 2006 tentang Pedoman Pengendalian Massa dalam pengamanan unjuk rasa oleh Korps Brimob. Jurnal Hukum, 10(1), 55–70.

Lonard, A. (2022). Gerakan mahasiswa menolak kenaikan harga BBM: Studi kasus Kota Malang. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 7(2), 98–110.

Putra, I. K. W. P., Suryawan, A., & Mahendra, P. (2020). Hak asasi manusia dan penegakan hukum dalam unjuk rasa. Jurnal HAM, 6(1), 15–27.

Hartoyo. (2024). Metode penelitian hukum normatif: Teori dan praktik. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Mukhtar. (2013). Metode praktis penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Jakarta: GP Press.

Yustino. (2023). Pendekatan kasus dalam penelitian hukum: Analisis normatif dan empiris. Surabaya: Laksbang Justitia.

Adhelia, F., Pratama, R., & Kurniawan, B. (2021). Paradigma penegakan hukum dalam tragedi sosial di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Pidana, 9(2), 134–148.

Andiarofi, R. (2024). Kebijakan pemerintah dalam penanganan tragedi Stadion Kanjuruhan. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 12(1), 22–39.

Awang, M., Arifin, R., & Yulianto, B. (2024). Usut tuntas tragedi Stadion Kanjuruhan: Perspektif hukum dan HAM. Jurnal Hukum dan HAM, 12(1), 45–60.

Dito, A. (2024). Pelanggaran HAM dalam praktik pengendalian massa: Analisis normatif. Jurnal Hak Asasi Manusia, 10(1), 55–71.

Enggalani, D., & Suratman, S. (2024). Peran kepolisian dalam tragedi Stadion Kanjuruhan: Tinjauan yuridis. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(1), 78–93.

Ika Yuliana, & Irma Istihara. (2023). Eksistensi negosiator dalam penanganan unjuk rasa berdasarkan Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 16 Tahun 2006 tentang Pedoman Pengendalian Massa. Jurnal Hukum, 9(2), 134–148.

Sari, P., & Wahyudi, R. (2024). Efektivitas penegakan hukum dalam kasus kerusuhan sosial. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum, 8(1), 90–105.

Sulaiman, A. (2021). Efektivitas hukum dalam praktik penegakan peraturan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.