TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK BERDASARKAN PASAL 310 KUHP

Faris  Septyan R

doi:10.53363/bureau.v2i3.62

Authors

Faris Septyan R Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.62

Keywords:

Defamatio, Criminal Actors, Accountability, Pencemaran Nama Baik, Pelaku Tindak Pidana, Pertanggung jawaban

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out what actions are included in the criminal act of defamation and what elements are contained in Article 310 of the Criminal Code and Article 27 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law relating to defamation. By using the normative juridical research method, it is concluded: 1. That in the criminal act of defamation there are acts which include insults contained in Article 310 of the Criminal Code, Article 311 of the Criminal Code, Article 315 of the Criminal Code, Article 317 of the Criminal Code, and Article 318 of the Criminal Code. 2. The criminal act of Defamation has elements included in it. These elements are the basis for us to assess the existence of an act of defamation, in these elements we can categorize every act committed by the perpetrator. If the perpetrator commits defamation by slandering someone, what we see are the elements included in the slander, whether it can be categorized in slander or more clearly the perpetrator committed a criminal act in Article 311 of the Criminal Code. We have to look at the elements in it, if indeed the perpetrator did what is in the elements of Article 311 of the Criminal Code, the perpetrator could be imprisoned under that article

Downloads

References

Anwar, M. (2004). Hukum Pidana Bagian Khusus (KUHP Buku II). Bandung: Citra Aditya.

Azhary, T. (2000). Negara Hukum. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Bland, M., Theaker, A., & Wragg, D. (2001). Hubungan Media Yang Efektif. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Chazawi, D. A. (2016). Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori Pidana, Teori-Teori Pemidanaan & Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rajawali Pres.

H.R, R. (2003). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Kuncoro. (2013). Penegakan Hukum. Dipetik April Saturday, 2016, dari http ://www.jimly.com/makalah/56/Penegakan_Hukum.pdf

Kurde, N. A. (2005). Telaah Kritis Teori Negara Hukum. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Lamintang, D. S. (2009). Delik-Delik Khusus Kejahatan Yang Ditujukan Terhadap Hak Millik Dan Lain-Lain Hak Yang Timbul Dari Hak Milik. Bandung: Tarsito.

Moeljanto. (2007). Hukum Pidana . Jakarta : Bumi Akasara .

Mulawarman, & Nurfitri, A. D. (2017). Perilaku Pengguna Media Sosial beserta Implikasinya Ditinjau dari Perspektif Psikologi Sosial Terapan. Buletin Psikologi, 37.

Nawawi Arief, B. (2006). Pedoman Perumusan/Formulasi Ketentuan Pidana dalam Perundang-undangan. Yogyakarta: Bahan Kuliah Program Ilmu Doktor.

Nawawi Arief, B. (2008). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana.

Permata Tami, N., & Putra Jaya, N. (2013). Studi Komparansi Pengaturan Pencemaran Nama Baik Menurut Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Perdata Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Serikat Jaya.

Putra , E. N. (2016). Pengiriman E-Mail Spam Sebagai Kejahatan Cyber Di Indonesia. Cakrawala Hukum, 169.

Soekanto, S. (2004). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suharyanto, B. (2013). Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cybercrime) Urgensi Pengaturan dan Celah Hukumnya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Suseno, S. (2013). Yurisdiksi Tindak Pidana Siber. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Wahid, A., & Labib, M. (2005). Kejahatan Mayantara (Cybercrime). Jakarta: PT. Refika Aditama.

Z. Wadjo, H. (2011). Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam Pemberitaan Pers. Sasi , 3-4.