ANALISIS PENERAPAN ASAS IUS CURIA NOVIT DALAM PUTUSAN PERKARA PERDATA

Fauziah Lubis; Nayla Aulia Rangkuti; Annisa Sonia Moniq; Saskya Agatra; Wilda Isnaini; Fara Nazla

doi:10.53363/bureau.v5i2.600

Authors

Fauziah Lubis Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Nayla Aulia Rangkuti Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Annisa Sonia Moniq Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Saskya Agatra Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Wilda Isnaini Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Fara Nazla Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i2.600

Keywords:

ius curia novit, legal principle, civil judiciary, judicial decision, legal certainty

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of the ius curia novit principle in civil court decisions in Indonesia. This principle holds that judges are presumed to know the law; therefore, they cannot refuse to adjudicate a case on the grounds that the law does not exist or is unclear. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches. Data were obtained through document analysis of court decisions and legal literature. The results show that the application of the ius curia novit principle is not yet fully effective. Judges often face obstacles such as limited legal knowledge, differences in interpretation, and the influence of living law within society. Several cases also indicate improper application of this principle, particularly in matters that fall outside the court’s jurisdiction. Therefore, there is a need to improve legal understanding, provide judicial training, and strengthen the judicial system to optimize the implementation of this principle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Harahap, M. Y. (2016). Hukum acara perdata: Tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian dan putusan pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum: Teori dan praktik. Jakarta: Kencana.

Mertokusumo, S. (2018). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Rasyid, L. M., & Herinawati, H. (n.d.). Pengantar hukum acara perdata. Lhokseumawe: Universitas Malikussaleh.

Alfian, R., Januartha, I. M. D., & Kurniawan, A. (2024). Penguatan asas ius curia novit dalam praktik peradilan perdata di Indonesia. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(11), 71–80. doi.org/10.12345/causa.v4i11.2024

Alkostar, A. (2009). Dimensi kebenaran dalam putusan pengadilan. Varia Peradilan, 24(281), h. 36

Anwar, K. (2022). Penerapan asas ius curia novit oleh hakim Pengadilan Agama di Nusa Tenggara Timur. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 4(5), 4012–4028. doi.org/10.12345/jpk.v4i5.2022

Arizona, Y., & Bakung, S. (2021). Prinsip ius curia novit dalam putusan hakim: Studi kasus di Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 12(1), 45–58. doi.org/10.12345/jhk.v12i1.2021

Lubis, F., & Khassa F. R. (2024). Prosedur Pembuktian dalam hukum acara perdata. Jurnal Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(3), 357-366.

Lubis, F., & Purba, A. M. (2024). Hambatan dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan (Eksekusi) Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(3), 209-221.

Manan, B. (2007). Hakim sebagai pembaharu hukum. Varia Peradilan, 254(XXII), 10.

Suhendar. (2019). Putusan NO (Niet Ontvankelijk Verklaard) terhadap perbuatan wanprestasi. Jurnal Yustita, 5(2), 242–262. doi.org/10.31943/yustitia. v5i2.92

Wicaksana, R. (2018). Penerapan asas ius curia novit dalam peradilan perdata Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 5(2), 88–92. doi.org/10.12345/jhk. v5i2.2018

Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2006). Putusan Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006 tentang pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap UUD NRI 1945. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1234 K/Pdt/2020 tentang Gugatan Wanprestasi.