IMPLEMENTASI PENYALAHGUNAAN DISKRESI YANG MELAHIRKAN TANGGUNG JAWAB PIDANA

Authors

  • Julista Mustamu Universitas Pattimura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i1.576

Keywords:

Abuse of Discretion, Criminal Responsibility, Penyalahgunaan Diskresi, Tanggung Jawab Pidana

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of abuse of discretion that gives birth to criminal responsibility in the context of Indonesian law. Discretion is an important authority given to government officials to overcome legal vacancies or ambiguities in the administration of government. However, in practice, there are often abuses that cause state losses and have implications for criminal liability. This research uses normative juridical methods with legislative, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of the study show that there is complexity in determining the parameters of the abuse of discretion that can be punished, given the different characteristics between administrative law and criminal law. The inconsistency of the court's approach in assessing abuse of discretion also creates legal uncertainty. The research recommends the need for a balance between the flexibility of discretion and effective control mechanisms, as well as clear parameters to distinguish between administrative and criminal abuses of discretion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A.M.Donner, :Nederlands Bestuursrecht, Samsom H.D.Tjeenk Willink,Alpena an den Rijn. 1987

Aminudin Illmar, Membangun Negara Hukum Indonesia, (Phinatama Media 2014)

Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana (Cahaya Atma Pustaka 2016)

F.A.M.Stroink, Pemahaman tentang Dekonsentrasi, diterjemahkan oleh Ateng Syarifudin, (Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2006)

Indriyanto Seno Adji, Korupsi dan Penegakan Hukum (Diadit Media 2009)

Krishna Djaya Darumurti, Diskresi: Kajian Teori Hukum (Genta Publishing 2016)

Nur Basuki Minarno, Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah (Laksbang Mediatama 2009)

Philippus M Hadjon, et.al., Hukum Administrasi dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Gadjah Mada University Press 2012)

Philipus M Hadjon, et al, Hukum Administrasi Dan Good Governance, (Universitas Trisakti, 2010)

Philipus M.Hadjon,Discretionary Power dan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik (AAUPB)

Pipit Kartawidjaya, Kritik Terhadap RUU Administrasi Pemerintahan

Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara (Raja Grafindo Persada 2016)

Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, (Yogyakarta; UII Press, 2003)

Sjachran Basah, Eksistensi dan Tolok Ukur Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia, (Alumni, Bandung, l985)

Fathudin, 'Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Dugaan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang) Pejabat Publik' (2015) 2(1) Jurnal Cita Hukum 121, 134 https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/citahukum/article/view/1844

Julista Mustamu, Diskresi dan Tanggungjawab Administrasi Pemerintahan (2011) 17(2) Jurnal Sasi 1, 7 https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/349

Yopie Morya Immanuel Patiro, 'Diskresi Pejabat Publik dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi' (2012) 19(1) Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia 2

Yulius, 'Perkembangan Pemikiran dan Pengaturan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang di Indonesia' (2015) 1(1) Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 61, 75. https://jurnalhukumdanperadilan.org/index.php/jurnalhukumperadilan/article/view/52

Downloads

Published

2025-04-04

How to Cite

Mustamu, J. (2025). IMPLEMENTASI PENYALAHGUNAAN DISKRESI YANG MELAHIRKAN TANGGUNG JAWAB PIDANA. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 5(1), 946–973. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i1.576