DEVELOPING A MODEL FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT AND POLLUTION PREVENTION IN NAVAL ENGINEERING OPERATIONS AT POLTEKPEL SULUT

Dedtri Anwar; Jaya Alamsyah; Hadi Setiawan

doi:10.53363/bureau.v5i1.561

Authors

Dedtri Anwar Politeknik Pelayaran Sulawesi Utara
Jaya Alamsyah Politeknik Pelayaran Sulawesi Utara
Hadi Setiawan Politeknik Pelayaran Sulawesi Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i1.561

Keywords:

Environmental Compliance, Naval Engineering Training,Naval Waste Management, Pollution Prevention, Sustainable Maritime Operations

Abstract

Background: Waste management and pollution prevention in naval engineering operations are critical to minimizing environmental damage and ensuring regulatory compliance. The Sulawesi Sea’s fragile ecosystem and maritime sustainability goals necessitate an effective and structured waste management framework for naval institutions. Despite the existence of environmental regulations, challenges persist in compliance enforcement, cadet training, and operational waste disposal efficiency. Original Value: This research contributes to naval environmental sustainability by developing a structured waste management model tailored to naval engineering training institutions. Unlike previous studies that focus on commercial shipping waste, this study provides a specific analysis of waste generation in naval engineering settings and offers targeted improvements for pollution prevention. Objectives: The study addresses how an optimized waste management and pollution prevention model can improve environmental sustainability in naval engineering operations, while also identifying training gaps and regulatory compliance challenges. Methodology: The research employs qualitative analysis through expert interviews, field observations, and structured surveys to evaluate current waste management effectiveness, regulatory adherence, and cadet engagement. Results: Findings indicate that waste segregation and pollution prevention measures are effective (88-92/100), but regulatory enforcement and hands-on cadet training require improvement (85/100). The proposed model is feasible (87/100) and cost-effective (89/100), ensuring long-term operational sustainability. Conclusions: Implementing structured waste policies, enhanced training modules, and technological advancements will optimize waste management in naval institutions, reducing environmental impact while improving regulatory compliance and operational efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alamoush, A. S., Ballini, F., & Ölçer, A. I. (2020). Ports’ technical and operational measures to reduce greenhouse gas emission and improve energy efficiency: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 160, 111508.

Albayrak, T., & Ziarati, R. (2012). Encouraging research in maritime education & training. Journal of Maritime Transport and Engineering, 1(1), 4–9.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. In Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (pp. 53–106). Sage Publications, Inc.

Das, A. P., Mohanty, A. K., van Hullebusch, E. D., & Figueiredo, G. (2023). Bioremediation as an emerging technology for the removal of synthetic microplastic pollutants from marine ecosystem. In Marine Pollution Bulletin (Vol. 194, p. 115297). Elsevier.

Dyagileva, O., Goridko, N., Popova, H., Voloshynov, S., & Yurzhenko, A. (2020). Ensuring sustainable development of education of future maritime transport professionals by means of network interaction.

Fang, S., Wang, Y., Gou, B., & Xu, Y. (2019). Toward future green maritime transportation: An overview of seaport microgrids and all-electric ships. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 69(1), 207–219.

Kidd, R., & McCarthy, E. (2019). Maritime education in the age of autonomy. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 187, 221–230.

Li, X., Zhou, Y., & Yuen, K. F. (2024). Blockchain implementation in the maritime industry: critical success factors and strategy formulation. Maritime Policy & Management, 51(2), 304–322.

Manuel, M. E. (2017). Vocational and academic approaches to maritime education and training (MET): Trends, challenges and opportunities. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16, 473–483.

Pu, S., & Lam, J. S. L. (2021). Blockchain adoptions in the maritime industry: a conceptual framework. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(6), 777–794.

Sæther, S. R., & Moe, E. (2021). A green maritime shift: Lessons from the electrification of ferries in Norway. Energy Research & Social Science, 81, 102282.

Saldana, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. SAGE publications.

Sharma, A. (2023). Potential of technology supported competence development for Maritime Education and Training.

Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8–12.