PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PENGGUNA JASA TUKANG GIGI TERHADAP DUGAAN MALPRAKTIK

Dicky Nur Oktaviano  Rizafaza; Yovita Arie  Mangesti

doi:10.53363/bureau.v2i3.56

Authors

Dicky Nur Oktaviano Rizafaza Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Yovita Arie Mangesti Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.56

Keywords:

Legal Protection, Service User, Practice, Dentist, Perlindungan Hukum, Pengguna Jasa, Praktik, Tukang Gigi

Abstract

This legal research aims to determine the regulation of the practice of dental artisans in health services as well as to determine the legal protection of dental artisan service users in the practice of dental artisans. This research was conducted using normative legal research methods. The research approach is a legal approach (statute approach) and a conceptual approach (conceptual approach). Based on this research, it was found that the regulation regarding dental practice refers to the Regulation of the Minister of Health no. 39 of 2014 concerning the Guidance, Supervision, Licensing and Employment of Dentists issued based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 40/PUU-X/2012 which is a Judicial Review decision. This rule does not provide legal protection for dental artisans who experience malpractice. Violations committed by dental artisans in carrying out their work cause victims to suffer losses. The legal implication of the absence of complete positive legal regulations and legal certainty from the government is an opportunity for dental artisans to practice or act beyond their authority, which results in the emergence of allegations of malpractice, which incur losses for consumers who perform dental care for the dental artisan. Legal protection should be provided through a new law on the practice of dental artisans which contains the authority of dental artisans so that there is a limit to the authority of dental artisans who are different from dentists. For dental artisans who practice as if they were dentists, they have violated Article 78 Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practices with criminal sanctions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adiani, Wayan. 2014. “PELAKSANAAN PERATURAN MENTERI KESEHATAN NOMOR 1871/MENKES/PER/IX/2011 TENTANG PENCABUTAN PERATURAN MENTERI KESEHATAN NOMOR 339/MENKES/PER/V/1989 TENTANG PEKERJAAN TUKANG GIGI”

Anggarita, Nyoman Kinandara, and Purwani Sagung Putri M.E. 2020. “PENGATURAN TUKANG GIGI DALAM PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG KESEHATAN”

BG SIMANJUNTAK. 2014. “KEABSAHAN TUKANG GIGI TERKAIT PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 40/PUU-X/2012 MENGENAI PERMOHONAN PERKARA PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 29 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG PRAKTIK KEDOKTERAN TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945 Berdaretta Gomgom Simanjuntak”

Bourdieu, Pierre, Literacy Education, James Albright, Allan Luke, Eds Abingdon, and others. 2018. “TANGGUNGJAWAB HUKUM KESEHATAN AHLI GIGI TERHADAP TINDAKAN MALPRAKTEK,” Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia –, 3.6

Sari, Anisa Nurlaila. 2019. “Analisis Hukum Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Jasa Tukang Gigi Menurut Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 39 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pembinaan Pengawasan Dan Perizinan Pekerjaan Tukang Gigi,” Cepalo, 2.1 <https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v2no1.1759>

Sri Isriawaty Fheryal. 2015. “Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Atas Kesehatan Masyarakat Berdasarkan Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, 3.2

Wiriadinata, Wahyu. 2014. “DOKTER, PASIEN DAN MALPRAKTIK,” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 26.1 <https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16053>

Hasaziduhu Moho. 2019. “Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, Dan Kemanfaatan,” Universitas Dharmawangsa, 13.1: 138–49

R. Abdoel Djamali. 2016. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia (Edisi Baru), Edisi revisi ke-21 (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Presada)

Yuningsih, Rahmi. 2012. “Pengobatan Tradisional Di Unit Pelayanan Kesehatan,” Info Singkat Kesejahteraan Sosial, 4.05