TRADISI PATRIARKI, TINGKAT PENDIDIKAN, LINGKUNGAN KELUARGA: DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP KEMISKINAN FEMINISME PADA MASYARAKAT BATAK TRADISIONAL

Authors

  • Juwita Handayani Universitas Graha Nusantara
  • Abdul Latif Lubis Universitas Graha Nusantara
  • Makhrani Makhrani Universitas Graha Nusantara
  • Lilis Suryani Lubis Universitas Graha Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i1.538

Keywords:

patriarki, pendidikan perempuan, lingkungan keluarga, kemiskinan feminisme, masyarakat Batak, patriarchy, women's education, family environment, feminist poverty, Batak society

Abstract

This study aims to examine the influence of patriarchal traditions, education levels, and family environments on feminist poverty in Batak society. Strong patriarchal culture places women in a subordinate position, limiting their rights in decision-making, education, and economic access. The results show that Batak women face cultural challenges that reinforce economic dependence on men, limited inheritance rights, and low priority of education for women. In addition, the family environment plays a significant role, both as a reinforcement of poverty through oppressive norms, and as a supporter when providing access to education and economic freedom. Feminist poverty in Batak society is not only in the form of low income, but also includes limited access to resources, health, and education, as well as social stigma that worsens the situation of women. This study emphasizes the importance of customary reform, increasing public awareness of gender equality, and inclusive education and economic policies as an effort to break the cycle of feminist poverty. These results are in line with Connell's patriarchal theory and Sen's views on the role of education in women's empowerment, and show the relevance of Bourdieu's social capital in shaping women's economic opportunities

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benería, L. (2003). Gender, Development, and Globalization: Economics as if All People Mattered. Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Chafetz, J. S. (1990). Gender and Society: A Global Perspective. Prentice Hall.

Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill.

Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209-230.

Global Partnership for Education (2023). Education for Girls and Women: Addressing the Global Gender Gap in Education. Retrieved from https://www.globalpartnership.org.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethical considerations in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93-96.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Alfred A. Knopf.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Anchor Books.

Silalahi, T. (2020). Patriarki dalam budaya Batak: Analisis struktural. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Willis, P. (2004). The Ethnographic Imagination: A Critical Perspective on the Sociology of Education. Palgrave Macmillan.

World Economic Forum (2022). Global Gender Gap Report 2022. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/gender-gap-2022.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-30

How to Cite

Handayani, J. ., Lubis, A. L. ., Makhrani, M., & Lubis, L. S. . (2025). TRADISI PATRIARKI, TINGKAT PENDIDIKAN, LINGKUNGAN KELUARGA: DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP KEMISKINAN FEMINISME PADA MASYARAKAT BATAK TRADISIONAL. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 5(1), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i1.538