ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PEMECATAN ASN

Authors

  • Joni Sandri Ritonga Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
  • Cindy Aulia Universitas Insaniah Sumatera Utara
  • Dea Zulfa Inayah Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
  • Mirna Syafitri Rahmadani Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Muhammad Aldi Khoiri Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Rizka Arifah Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
  • Sumantri Ritonga Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i1.533

Keywords:

Absolute competence, Administrative Court, Civil Servants, Dismissal, Dispute., Kompetensi absolut, Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara, Aparatur Sipil Negara, Pemecatan, Sengketa.

Abstract

This study analyzes the absolute competence of the Administrative Court (PTUN) in resolving disputes concerning the dismissal of Civil Servants (ASN) from a juridical perspective. The absolute competence of PTUN represents exclusive authority that cannot be delegated to other judicial institutions. In the context of ASN dismissal, PTUN functions as a forum for resolving disputes arising from final and concrete decisions made by administrative officials. This research aims to identify the boundaries of PTUN's absolute competence in ASN dismissal cases and to examine the relevance and effectiveness of this authority in providing legal protection for ASN. The study adopts a normative juridical approach by analyzing legislation, court decisions, and related legal doctrines. The findings reveal that PTUN plays a significant role in assessing the legality of ASN dismissal decisions. However, the limits of PTUN's absolute competence often spark debates, particularly in disputes involving employment aspects such as disciplinary violations or the implementation of Government Regulation Number 94 of 2021 on Civil Servant Discipline. The study also finds that procedural and substantive irregularities in the dismissal process frequently serve as grounds for annulment by PTUN. Nevertheless, coordination between PTUN and the Civil Service Advisory Board (Badan Pertimbangan ASN) requires strengthening to ensure comprehensive legal protection. In conclusion, PTUN's absolute competence in ASN dismissal disputes remains relevant but necessitates regulatory harmonization to avoid overlapping authority and to ensure substantive justice for ASN.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(BKN), B. K. (2020). Panduan Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepegawaian (Dokumen Internal BKN). Jakarta: Pemerintah Indonesia.

(BKN), B. K. (2022). Pedoman Penegakan Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Jakarta: BKN.

(2010). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 53 Tahun 2010 tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil.

(2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 94 Tahun 2021 tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Jakarta: Pemerintah Indonesia.

Aswanto, A. (2013). Prinsip-Prinsip Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik (AUPB) dalam Hukum Administrasi Negara.

Brown, A. (2020). The Role of Administrative Courts in Employment Disputes. . International Journal of Legal Studies, 211-229.

Dewi, S. M. (2019). Kompetensi Absolut PTUN dalam Sengketa Kepegawaian ASN. Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 123–140.

Dewi, S. M. (2020). Peran PTUN dalam Menjamin Kepastian Hukum Bagi ASN. Jurnal Hukum Administrasi Negara, 145–160.

Jones, M. (2021). Administrative Law in Practice: Global and Local Perspectives. . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mahendra, B. (2019). “Peran PTUN dalam Menguji Keputusan Pemecatan ASN: Analisis Studi Kasus”. . Jurnal Hukum Administrasi, 112-130.

Mardjono, R. (2015). Hukum Administrasi Negara (Edisi Revisi).

Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana.

Muchsin. (2003). Peranan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Perlindungan Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Muchsin. (2003). Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum bagi Investor di Indonesia. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Rahardjo, S. (2018). Hukum Administrasi Negara di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UGM Press.

Siregar, A. S. (2019). Kompetensi PTUN dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepegawaian . Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Negara.

Sundari, S. (2017). Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.

Suryadi, D. (2012). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Susanti, R. (2020). Hukum Administrasi Negara: Prinsip dan Implementasi. . Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

(n.d.). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.

(n.d.). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-30

How to Cite

Ritonga, J. S., Aulia, C. ., Inayah, D. Z. ., Rahmadani, M. S. ., Aldi Khoiri, M., Arifah, R. ., & Ritonga, S. . (2025). ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PEMECATAN ASN. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 5(1), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v5i1.533