CIVIL FORFEITURE SEBAGAI UPAYA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN NEGARA PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.52Keywords:
the country's economy, Return of losses, Corruption, Perekonomian negara, Pengembalian kerugian, KorupsiAbstract
Corruption is one of the causes of poverty in many countries, including Indonesia. Corruption causes state losses, so that the return of state financial losses must be carried out by corruptors to restore the Indonesian economy. The mechanism for recovering state financial losses has been regulated in Indonesia through criminal and civil channels. However, the implementation has not been optimally carried out by the State. Based on this, this study aims to determine the concept of civil forfeiture in returning state losses from corruption. The research method used is normative juridical. The results of the study state that in Indonesia the concept of returning state losses is based on criminal charges carried out by the Public Prosecutor and then executed by investigators, while the concept of civil forfeiture is carried out in a civil manner, where civil claims are carried out simultaneously with criminal charges. This is implemented in the United States, and in Indonesia it has the potential to apply it so that the return of state financial losses can be carried out optimally
Downloads
References
A Buchari ·2018. 2018. ‘NoTitle’: 249–62
Darmukit, Darmukit. 2020. ‘UPAYA KEJAKSAAN DALAM PENGEMBALIAN ASET NEGARA SEBAGAI HASIL DARI TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI’, Jurnal Hukum, 36.1 <https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v36i1.11200>
Fauzan Reyzaldi Sinaga. 2019. Universitas Sumatera Utara <https://repositori.usu.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/15894/150200548.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y> [accessed 25 March 2022]
Hamzah, Andi. 2005. Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional Dan Internasional (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada)
Hayati, Nur, and Andrea Reynaido. 2009. ‘Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Yang Dilakukan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi ( Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No . 2257 K / Pid / 2006 )’, Lex Jurnalica, 7.31
Nasution, Bismar. 2017. ‘Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Civil Forfeiture’, Jurnal Integritas: 1–13
Nawawi, Kabib, and Andi Najemi. 2021. ‘Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Kejaksaan Negeri Kuala Tungkal’, Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 5.1 <https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v5i1.14133>
Siregar, Nella Octaviany. 2011. ‘Plea Bargaining Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Beberapa Negara’, 3.1: 1–9 <https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v3i1.46>
Yusuf, Dalam Muhammad. 2007. Merampas Aset Koruptor (Jakarta: Kompas)
Undang-Undang tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2001, Lembaran Negara RI No. 134 Tahun 2001, Tambahan Lembaran Negara R.I No. 4150
Siregar, Nella Octaviany. 2011. ‘Plea Bargaining Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Beberapa Negara’, 3.1: 1–9 <https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v3i1.46>
Yusuf, Dalam Muhammad. 2007. Merampas Aset Koruptor (Jakarta: Kompas)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Pradani Tyas Septiana, Wiwik Afifah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.