PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN KEWENANGAN DISKRESI YANG BERIMPLIKASI TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.51Keywords:
korupsi, penyalahgunaan kewenangan, Diskresi, corruption, abuse of authority, DiscretionAbstract
The government has the power to intervene in all aspects of people's lives through public power, including areas not regulated by law. This condition then causes the state to need its own initiatives and policies. This is what is called the concept of discretion in administrative law. However, the exercise of discretion also tends to detect abuse and arbitrariness of duties, which can result in criminal acts of corruption as referred to in Article 3 of the Anti-Corruption Law. Because the discretionary authority is for the public interest or the public interest, then if the discretionary authority is used for purposes other than the public interest or the public interest, then the discretionary act becomes a criminal act of corruption in terms of crime. This could be considered the abuse of influential work.
Downloads
References
Bagir Manan. (2008). Peraturan Kebijakan. Varia Peradilan.
Hartono. (2012). Penyidikan dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Peter Marzuki. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Pernada Media Group.
Puspa, Y. P. (1977). Kamus Hukum Edisi Lengkap Bahasa Belanda-Indonesia-Inggris. CV. Aneka.
Rahman Syamsuddin. (2013). Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Integritas Keilmuan.
Rais, M. (2017). Nilai Keadilan Putusan Hakim Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Al Daulah?: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan, 6(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v6i1.4870
Soedirjo. (1985). Jaksa dan Hakim Dalam Proses Pidana. Akademika Pressindo.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Samsul Qamaruddin Bowta, Hufron Hufron
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.