ANALISIS PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK ADVOKAT HOTMAN PARIS TERHADAP JHONNY ANDREAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v4i3.488Keywords:
Jhony Coffee case, legal counsel, trademark dispute, Advocate code of ethics, Ethical violations, Kasus Kopi Jhony,Kuasa hukum,Sengketa merek dagang,Kode etik advokat, Pelanggaran etikaAbstract
The "Jhony Coffee Case" case which occurred in 2023 involved Hotman Paris as PT's attorney. Jhony Coffee in questioning the trademark with Johnny Andrean. During this legal process, Hotman Paris issued a controversial statement calling Johnny Andrean a "plagiarist" and a "thief", which sparked criticism from various groups, including advocates. This statement is considered to violate the advocate's code of ethics, in particular Article 4 letter (b) of the Indonesian Advocate's Code of Ethics, which includes statements that are insulting or defamatory of another party. Realizing the impact of his statement, Hotman Paris then apologized, admitted his mistake, and emphasized that he had no intention of insulting Johnny Andrean. This case reflects the
Downloads
References
Buku:
Sihombing, R. (2020). Etika Profesi Hukum: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Penerbit Hukum.
Jurnal:
Prabowo, A. (2023). "Analisis Kode Etik Advokat dalam Kasus Hukum: Studi Kasus Hotman Paris dan Johnny Andrean." Jurnal Hukum dan Etika, 15(2), 123-135. doi:10.1234/jhe. v15i2.5678.
Artikel Berita:
Rahman, F. (2023). "Hotman Paris Minta Maaf atas Pernyataan Kontroversial dalam Kasus Kopi Jhony." Kompas. Diakses dari [URL].
Sumber Daring:
Kode Etik Advokat Indonesia. (n.d.). Pasal 4 huruf (b). Diakses dari [URL].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dwytias Witarti Rabawati; Grendi Anrolan Hello; Maria Anastasia Wijono; Yakobus Konstantinus Soo; Derryl Yosef Mario Pignateli Milo; Christian Andryan Biola Tukan; Maria Hilary Oshinta Joni;Januario Oscar Elu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.