KESADARAN HUKUM WAJIB LAPOR KETENAGAKERJAAN PERUSAHAAN PADA YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN BERBASIS AGAMA ISLAM

STUDI KASUS KOTA SAMARINDA

Authors

  • Muhammad Fais Fadlurrahman Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
  • Rio Arif Pratama Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1084-4974
  • Rahmatullah Ayu Hasmiati Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v4i3.432

Keywords:

Mandatory Report, Company, Educational Foundation, Laporan Wajib, Perusahaan, Yayasan Pendidikan

Abstract

Mandatory Company Employment Report (WLKP) has been regulated in Law No. 7 of 1981. According to the law, mandatory employment reporting is an obligation for all companies and employers who employ workers by paying wages or rewards, this obligation is for companies to carry out and report employment data to the local labor office, including the education sector, both educational foundations and other educational institutions, but in fact, there are still many educational institutions and educational foundations that are still not implement the provisions of the Company's Mandatory Employment Report. The purpose of this study is to find out how the Implementation of Mandatory Employment Reporting in the Education Sector, as well as what obstacles must be faced by various school foundations and obstacles faced by supervisors who are required to report to the company's employment. The method in this study uses an empirical juridical method, the data sources of this study are sourced from library research and Field Research. By the random sampling method. The results of the study show that there are still few educational foundations and educational institutions that have not implemented the provisions of the Mandatory Corporate Employment Report. It is recorded that only twenty (20) Foundations in East Kalimantan carry out the Mandatory Corporate Employment Report, from this data there are no foundations or educational institutions in Samarinda City. In this case, the lack of understanding of mandatory company employment report and the lack of supervisory resources are one of the main factors, and there are other obstacles that hinder the Mandatory Employment Reporting Process of Companies in the Education Sector

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atufah, Intan Devi. “Penerapan PSAK No.45 Tentang Pelaporan Keuangan Organisasi Nirlaba Yayasan Pendidikan Pondok Pesantren Al-Khairiyah.” International Journal of Social Science and Business 2, no. 3 (2018): 116.

Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., Ketut Sudibia, Yasa Ni Nyoman Murjana, and Ni Putu Martini Dewi Yuliarmi. Kondisi Pasar Kerja Di Provinsi Bali: Implementasi Undang- Undang Wajib Lapor Ketenagakerjaan Di Perusahaan. Universitas Udayana, 2017.

Pratama, Rio arif, and Bayu Prasetyo. Tantangan Penerapan Norma Kerja Pada Malam Hari. Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur, 2019.

Prihardiati, RR Lylia Aina. “Teori Hukum Pembangunan Anatara Das Sein Dan Das Sollen.” HERMENEUTIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 1 (2021).

Rahman, B. P. “Pengertian Pendidikan, Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Unsur-Unsur Pendidikan.” Al Urwatul Wutsqa: Kajian Pendidikan Islam 2, no. 1 (2022): 2.

Suryono, Ari, Eko Subyantoro, and Agiska Ria Supriyatna. “Aplikasi Pengolahan Data Wajib Lapor Ketenagakerjaan Pada Disnakertrans Provinsi Lampung Berbasis Web Framework Larave.” Politekhnik Negeri Lampung, 2018.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 1981 Tentang Wajib Lapor Ketenagakerjaan di Perusahaan

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2001 Tentang Yayasan.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan

Downloads

Published

2024-10-10

How to Cite

Fadlurrahman , M. F. ., Pratama, R. A. ., & Hasmiati , R. A. . (2024). KESADARAN HUKUM WAJIB LAPOR KETENAGAKERJAAN PERUSAHAAN PADA YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN BERBASIS AGAMA ISLAM: STUDI KASUS KOTA SAMARINDA. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 4(3), 2436–2448. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v4i3.432