PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUSKAN BESARAN BUNGA MORATOIR
Analisis Putusan No: 04/Pdt.G/2011/PN Gto dan Putusan No: 13/Pdt.G/2020/PN Tar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v4i2.426Keywords:
Judge's Decision, Default, Moratary Interest, Putusan Hakim, Wanprestasi, Bunga MoratoirAbstract
Based on the analysis conducted on two court decisions, namely Gorontalo District Court Decision No. 04/Pdt.G/2011/PN Gto and Tarakan District Court Decision No. 13/Pdt.G/2020/PN Tar, the results obtained illustrate the differences in the judges' perspectives in deciding moratorium interest due to default. In Decision No. 04/Pdt.G/2011/PN Gto, the judge decided that the moratorium interest to be paid by the defendant was 2 (two) percent per month, while in Decision No. 13/Pdt.G/2020/PN Tar, the judge decided that the moratorium interest to be paid by the defendant was 6 (six) percent per year or in accordance with the interest according to Article 1767 of the Civil Code. The judge in Decision No. 04/Pdt.G/2011/PN Gto adheres to the understanding of progressive law, daring to follow the development of society. In Decision No. 13/Pdt.G/2020/PN Tar tends to adhere to a rigid positivistic understanding while still implementing the provisions of the law
Downloads
References
F. Sugeng Istanto, 2007. Penelitian Hukum, Yogyakarta: CV. Ganda.
Subekti, 1992. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Cetakan XXIV, Jakarta: PT Intermasa.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2004. Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Edisi Kedua Cetakan III, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
__________________, 2010. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, cetakan I, Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya.
J. Satrio, 1995. Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan yang Lahir dari Perjanjian Buku 1, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aurelius Kasimirus Yori, Very Werson Sutanto, Rosa Patricia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
