PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUSKAN BESARAN BUNGA MORATOIR

Analisis Putusan No: 04/Pdt.G/2011/PN Gto dan Putusan No: 13/Pdt.G/2020/PN Tar

Authors

  • Aurelius Kasimirus Yori Universitas Atma Jaya Makassar
  • Very Werson Sutanto Universitas Atma Jaya Makassar
  • Rosa Patricia Universitas Atma Jaya Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v4i2.426

Keywords:

Judge's Decision, Default, Moratary Interest, Putusan Hakim, Wanprestasi, Bunga Moratoir

Abstract

Based on the analysis conducted on two court decisions, namely Gorontalo District Court Decision No. 04/Pdt.G/2011/PN Gto and Tarakan District Court Decision No. 13/Pdt.G/2020/PN Tar, the results obtained illustrate the differences in the judges' perspectives in deciding moratorium interest due to default. In Decision No. 04/Pdt.G/2011/PN Gto, the judge decided that the moratorium interest to be paid by the defendant was 2 (two) percent per month, while in Decision No. 13/Pdt.G/2020/PN Tar, the judge decided that the moratorium interest to be paid by the defendant was 6 (six) percent per year or in accordance with the interest according to Article 1767 of the Civil Code. The  judge in Decision No. 04/Pdt.G/2011/PN Gto adheres to the understanding of progressive law, daring to follow the development of society. In Decision No. 13/Pdt.G/2020/PN Tar tends to adhere to a rigid positivistic understanding while still implementing the provisions of the law

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

F. Sugeng Istanto, 2007. Penelitian Hukum, Yogyakarta: CV. Ganda.

Subekti, 1992. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Cetakan XXIV, Jakarta: PT Intermasa.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2004. Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Edisi Kedua Cetakan III, Liberty, Yogyakarta.

__________________, 2010. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, cetakan I, Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya.

J. Satrio, 1995. Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan yang Lahir dari Perjanjian Buku 1, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Downloads

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

Yori, A. K. ., Sutanto, V. W. ., & Patricia, R. . (2024). PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUSKAN BESARAN BUNGA MORATOIR: Analisis Putusan No: 04/Pdt.G/2011/PN Gto dan Putusan No: 13/Pdt.G/2020/PN Tar. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 4(2), 1540–1549. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v4i2.426