MENCEGAH PENIPUAN DI PERUSAHAAN KELAPA SAWIT: MENJELAJAHI KERANGKA HUKUM DAN SISTEM PENGAWASAN

Authors

  • Rahmatsyah Rahmatsyah Universitas Nusa Putra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v4i2.425

Keywords:

fraud; Indonesian legal system; palm oil companies; regulations; supervisory system, penipuan; sistem hukum Indonesia; perusahaan kelapa sawit; regulasi; Sistem pengawasan

Abstract

Palm oil companies generate significant profits, making them susceptible to crimes, including fraud. The aim of this research is to understand the regulations regarding fraud in private companies (palm oil companies) and to examine the use of supervisory systems within the Indonesian legal system. This study is conducted using a normative juridical approach. The research findings indicate that there are legal provisions for addressing fraudulent activities in both the public and private sectors (such as palm oil companies). The surveillance system also needs to be implemented by conducting covert observations, unbeknownst to the employees, in order to obtain genuine information. This is done as one of the efforts to control fraud

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACFE. (2016). Report to Nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. Austin.

Anugerah, R. (2014). Peranan Good Corporate Governance. Jurnal Akuntansi, 3(1), 101–113.

Bakce, R., & Mustofa, R. (2021). Kesempatan Kerja dan Kelayakan Ekonomi Usaha Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Rakyat Di Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Penelitian, 2(7), 2213–2220.

Baten, A. (2018). Fraud Prevention in Private Sector Organizations. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 2(1).

BPS. (2022). Produksi Tanaman Perkebunan (Ribu Ton), 2019-2021.

Dihni, V. A. (2022). Gapki: Produksi CPO Turun 0,31% pada 2021, Ini Faktornya.

Djanegara, M. S. (2017). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi, 21(3), 461. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v21i3.252

Flowerastia, R. D., Trisnawati, E., & Budiono, H. (2021). Fraud Awareness, Internal Control, and Corporate Governance on Fraud Prevention and Detection, Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics, Business, Social, and Humanities (ICEBSH 2021). Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 570.

Hafil, M. (2021). Kejagung Tangkap DPO Penggelapan Cangkang Sawit Bengkulu.

Indrawan, A., & Holiawati. (2022). Analisis Audit Internal Atas Pengakuan dan Pengukuran Aset Biologis pada Perusahaan Kelapa Sawit. Tantangan Pengembangan Ilmu Akuntansi, Inklusi Keuangan, Dan Kontribusinya Terhadap Pembangunan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan.

Kasgari, A Bagherian, Sheykhi, K., & Mousavi, H. (2016). Is it possible to proactively detect frauds with zero cost? Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT), 5(7).

Kasgari, Abbas Bagherian, Taghavifard, M. T., & Kharazi, S. G. (2019). Price manipulation fraud detection by Intelligent Visual Fraud surveillance system, 2019 6th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT’19). International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT’19). France.

Malle, G. G., Mwonge, L. A., & Naho, A. (2022). Effectiveness of fraud prevention and detection methods in the public sector in Tanzania. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 14(1), 30–36.

Maloku, A. (2020). Theory of Differential Association. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 9(1).

Marzuki, M. (2022). Pengungkapan Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Penggelapan dengan Modus Operandi akan Menikahi Korban di Kepolisian Sektor Syamta Aceh Utara. Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 10(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.29103/sjp.v10i1.7937

Massie, M. (2017). Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam Menggunakan Jabatan Berdasarkan Pasal 415 KUHP. Lex Crimen, 6(7).

Nassarudin, E. H. (2016). Kriminologi. Bandung: CV. Pustaka.

Othman, R., Aris, N. A., Mardziyah, A., Zainan, N., & Amin, N. M. (2015). Fraud detection and prevention methods in the Malaysian public sector: Accountants’ and internal auditors’ perceptions. Procedia Economics and Finance , 28, 59–67.

Prakoso, A. (2013). Kriminologi dan Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Grafika.

Prasetyo, H. (2019). Company Culture As An Alternative Solution To Prevent Fraud In Workplace. Veteran Law Review, 2(1), 21–32.

PWC. (2018). Pulling fraud out of the shadows Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey. United Kingdom: PWC.

Sari, W., & Farida, H. (2022). Analisa Kriminologis Kejahatan Pencurian Berdasarkan Teori Differential Association. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 6(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v6i2.6084

Sayyid, A. (2014). Pemeriksaan Fraud Dalam Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif. Al-Banjari, 13(2), 137–162.

Situmeang, S. M. T. (2021). Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi Sebagai Bentuk Kejahatan Sempurna Dalam Perspektif Hukum Siber. SASI, 27(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.394

Soekanto, S. (2014). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Depok: UI-Pers.

Sow, A. N., Basiruddin, R., Mohammad, J., & Rasid, S. Z. A. (2018). Fraud prevention in Malaysian small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Financial Crime, 25(2), 499–517.

Tembhare, P. U., Katre, A. K., Adgurwar, D. A., Bagmare, S. M., & Harinkhede, S. (2020). Smart Surveillance System Using Artificial Intelligence. ", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 7(4), 439–446.

Ulum, S. N., & Suryatimur, K. P. (2022). Analisis Peran Sistem Pengendalian Internal dan Good Corporate Governance dalam Upaya Pencegahan Fraud. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 10(2), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v10i2.1328

Yu, L., & Diandian, M. (2019). Internal Control Weakness: A Literature Revi. Accounting and Finance Research, 8(2), 201

Downloads

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

Rahmatsyah, R. (2024). MENCEGAH PENIPUAN DI PERUSAHAAN KELAPA SAWIT: MENJELAJAHI KERANGKA HUKUM DAN SISTEM PENGAWASAN. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 4(2), 1526–1539. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v4i2.425