PELAKSANAAN DIVERSI TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SIDOARJO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i3.375Keywords:
Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo, Anak, Diversi, Sidoarjo District Court, Child, DiversionAbstract
Children are the younger generation as the successor of the nation's ideals and also play a role as national development in the future, so that guidance and protection are needed to ensure protection from all things that can damage children's future. The development of science and technology makes criminal acts committed by children increasingly rampant. The implementation of diversion is motivated by the desire to avoid negative effects on the psychological and mental health of children due to their involvement with the criminal justice system. However, in practice the implementation of diversion often fails, especially when it reaches the District Court level, this causes children to have to deal directly with the formal criminal justice process. Furthermore, juvenile criminal justice can have a negative impact in the form of evil stigmatization of children as perpetrators of criminal acts which can increase deviant behavior and form criminal characters so that it is difficult for children to return to their natural environment. This study uses an empirical juridical method using empirical facts taken directly verbally, namely interviews. The results of this study are that cases of criminal acts committed by children in the Sidoarjo District Court experience more failure than success, this makes children as perpetrators of criminal acts have to undergo further criminal justice processes. There are factors that support and hinder the implementation of diversion at the Sidoarjo District Court so that it often fails. Against this condition, the Sidoarjo District Court seeks to overcome the inhibiting factors for the implementation of diversion by increasing the quality and quantity of law enforcers within the Sidoarjo District Court, increasing cooperation with related law enforcement agencies to resolve disputes between parties, and updating the facilities and infrastructure for special rooms to implement examination of children as perpetrators of criminal acts
Downloads
References
Djamil, M. Nasir, Anak Bukan untuk Dihukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.
Koesno Adi, Kebijakan kriminal dalam penanggulangan tindak pidana narkotika oleh anak, UMM Press, Malang, 2009.
Koesno Adi, Kebijakan Kriminal dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana yang Berorientasi pada Kepentingan terbaik Anak dalam Achmad Ratomi. “Konsep Prosedur Pelaksanaan Diversi Pada Tahap Penyidikan dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana yang Dilakukan oleh Anak.” 2013.
Marlina, Pengantar konsep diversi dan restoratif justice dalam hukum pidana, USU Press. Medan, 2010.
Masruhan, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Surabaya: Hilal Pustaka, 2013.
Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada 2008.
Zainuddin Ali, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika,. 2013.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2012 Nomor 153, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5332).
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Anak (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 297, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5606).
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diveri Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 1052).
A. R Hambali. “Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana”, Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, Maret 2019, Volume 13 Nomor 1.
Beniharmoni Harefa, “Diversi Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Asasi Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, Februari 2015, Volume 1 Nomor 1.
Diah Ratna Sari Hariyanto & Gde Made Swardhana, “Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Yang Berorientasi Pada Restorative Justice Di Kota Denpasar”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, September 2021, Vol.18 No 3.
Jaelani, Elan. “Penegakan Hukum Upaya Diversi”, Jurnal Kertha Patrika, Agustus 2018, Volume 40 Nomor 2.
Ricky Martin Sihombing, M Hamdan, and Marlina, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan (Analisis Putusan No. 9/PID.SUS-ANAK/2018/PN TJB)”, Jurnal Mahupiki, 2019, Volume 1 Nomor 9.
Siti Komariah, Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba, “Penerapan Konsep Diversi Bagi Anak Penyandang Disabilitas Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan”, Jurnal USM Law Review (2021), Volume 4 Nomor 2.
Zulfikar Judge, “Kedudukan Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Selaku Pelaku Tindak Pidana (Studi Kasus?: 123/PID.SUS/2014/PN.JKT.TIM)”, Lex Jurnalica, April 2016, Volume 13 Nomor 1.
Wawancara dengan Ibu Hj. Eni Sri Rahayu, S.H., M.H. selaku Hakim yang menangani kasus tindak pidana oleh anak di Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo.
Wawancara dengan Ibu Reny, S.H. selaku Selaku Staf Bidang Administrasi di Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo.
Wawancara dengan Bapak Sulkhan Alif Fauzi, S.H. selaku Ketua Divisi Hukum di Surabaya Childern Crisis Center (SCCC).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Zihan Maulani, Adhitya Widya Kartika

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.