KEBIJAKAN KRIMINAL DALAM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA BAGI PELAKU ANIMAL ABUSE DI INDONESIA DAN SINGAPURA

Okchelita Nettasari Anugrahning  Cantik; Hervina  Puspitosari

doi:10.53363/bureau.v4i1.367

Authors

Okchelita Nettasari Anugrahning Cantik Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur
Hervina Puspitosari Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v4i1.367

Keywords:

Animal Abuse, Crime, Law Enforcement, Penyiksaan Hewan, Tindak Pidana, Penegakan Hukum

Abstract

Currently, it is not uncommon for cases to occur which cause the animal to suffer injuries and can even lead to death. Law enforcement against criminal acts of cruelty and abuse of animals. There are many cases of animal crime, such as abuse and abuse of animals by humans. The results of the research show that law enforcement for animal abuse in Indonesia is still considered to be less effective, due to sanctions that are still considered weak, and a lack of public empathy. Due to this, there is still urgency to discuss the comparison of regulations regarding animal abuse in Indonesia with regulations from other countries, namely Singapore. In this research, the Normative Juridical method is used and uses a statutory approach and uses interviews as secondary legal material. This research aims to find out what criminal liability is regarding perpetrators of animal abuse in Indonesia and Singapore as well as what criminal policies are appropriate and efficient for implementing sanctions for perpetrators of animal abuse in Indonesia. The results of this research show that currently the regulations regarding criminal liability for perpetrators of animal abuse in Indonesia are still not appropriate and not in accordance with the provisions of applicable laws and regulations and are still relatively low when compared with the laws and regulations in force in Singapore because of the penalties imposed by Singapore is significantly higher than Indonesia. This is because the Indonesian people still have a low level of understanding regarding animal welfare and there are still certain customs that use animal meat such as dogs as staple food or similar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ismu Gunadi dan Jonaedi Efendi, 2014, Cepat dan Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group

Sudarto, Hukum Pidana dan Perkembangan Masyarakat, Sinar Baru, Bandung,1983.

Arief, Barda Nawawi , Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan penyusunan Konsep KUHP baru, KencanaPrenadamedia Group, Semarang, 2008

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2014 tentang Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan

Animal and Birds Act

Thrischa Vidia Kusuma, 2015, Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan atau Kekerasan Hewan dalam Tradisi Kerapan Sapi di Kabupaten Bangkalan Madura, Recidive, Volume 4, No. 1, Surakarta: Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret.

Jonathan Toar Mampow, 2017, Suatu Kajian Atas Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Terhadap Hewan Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Lex Administratum, Vo. V, Nomor 2, Manado: Universitas Sam Ratulangi.

Anak Agung Ngurah Bayu Kresna Wardana, I Gusti Ayu Agung Ari Krisnawati, 2016, Penjatuhan Hukuman Untuk Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Hewan, Bali: Universitas Udayana.

Nugroho, B. A., 2015, Studi Komparasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Tentang Penganiayaan Hewan Antara Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia dengan Negara Bagian Illionis Amerika Serikat. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Wawancara dengan Bapak AIPTU Catur Arif Wibowo sebagai Penyidik Pembantu Satreskrim Polrestabes Surabaya di Polrestabes Surabaya pada 01 September 2023 Pukul 10.00 WIB.

Wawancara dengan Ibu Qory sebagai founder dari Yayasan Peduli Kucing di Rumah Kucing Surabaya pada 19 September 2023 Pukul 16.00 WIB.

Wawancara dengan Ibu Yuke perwakilan KCCS di Rainbow Cat Shelter Surabaya pada 21 September 2023 Pukul 12.00 WIB.