AKIBAT HUKUM KEPAILITAN PERORANGAN TERHADAP PERSEROAN PERORANGAN

Laili Putri  Rahayu; Moh.  Saleh

doi:10.53363/bureau.v3i3.357

Authors

Laili Putri Rahayu Universitas Narotama
Moh. Saleh Universitas Narotama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i3.357

Keywords:

perseroan perorangan, kepailitan, akibat hukum, individual companies, bankruptcy, legal consequences

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the legal consequences of company bankruptcy for individuals and the legal certainty of company bankruptcy for individuals. The method used in this study is normative juridical with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This study uses primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Data collection uses document study or literature study techniques. The data that has been obtained is analyzed qualitatively using deductive and inductive methods or interpretation is carried out. The results of the study show that a person who is declared bankrupt in an individual company can apply for cancellation of all forms of legal action against assets to the court before the decision to declare bankruptcy is pronounced. An individual company that has been declared bankrupt through a court decision can immediately give rise to legal consequences, namely the debtor loses the right to carry out management and control over the assets owned and everything produced during bankruptcy, and the rights and obligations of the bankrupt debtor are transferred to the curator to manage and control The rules are as regulated in Article 19 to Article 62 of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Desak Putu Dewi Kasih, A.A. Gede Duwira Hadi Santosa, I Made Marta Wijaya, dan Putri Triari Dwijayathi. (2022). Perseroan Perorangan Pasca UU Cipta Kerja: Perubahan Paradigma Perseroan Terbatas sebagai Asosiasi Modal. Arena Hukum, 15(1), 20-37.

Elyta Ras Ginting. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan Teori Kepailitan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Fiona Chrisanta dan Rahil Sasia Putri Harahap. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pemegang Saham Selaku Direktur dalam Perseroan Perorangan terhadap Putusan Pernyataan Kepailitan. Primagraha Law Review, 1(1), 57-70.

Ima Mayasari. (2020). Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi Melalui Implementasi Omnibus Law Di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 9(1), 1-15.

Imran Nating. (2004). Peranan dan Tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata).

Monica Agustina Gloria. (2020). Kepailitan Perseroan Perorangan Dalam Undang- Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 6(1), 24-31.

Muhammad Faiz Aziz. (2020). Mewujudkan PT Perseorangan bagi Usah Mikro Kecil melalui Rancangan Undang-undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Rechtvinding, 9(1), 94- 104.

Munir Fuady. (2005). Hukum Pailit dalam Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Natzir Said. (1987). Hukum Perusahaan di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Modal Dasar Perseroan serta Pendaftaran Pendirian, Perubahan, dan Pembubaran Perseroan yang Memenuhi Kriteria untuk Usaha Mikro dan Kecil.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2016). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Rahmadi Indra Tektona dan Dwi Ruli Handoko. (2022). Implikasi Hukum Pailitnya Perseroan Perorangan Terhadap Direksi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 6(2), 115-129.

Rumawi, Siti Sariroh, Udiyo Basuki, Mellisa Towadi, Moh. Ali, dan Supianto. (2023). Karakteristik Perseroan Terbatas Perorangan dalam Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 12(2), 63-73.

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja.

Yuhelson. (2019). Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Gorontalo: Ideas Publishing.