PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM JUSTICE COLLABORATOR PADA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DI POLRESTA SIDOARJO

Moch. Fahmi  Abdillah; Hariyo  Sulistiyantoro

doi:10.53363/bureau.v3i3.352

Authors

Moch. Fahmi Abdillah Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur
Hariyo Sulistiyantoro Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i3.352

Keywords:

Perlindungan Justice Collaborator, Justice Collaborator, Narkotika, Protection of Justice Collaborator, Narcotics

Abstract

In its implementation, the rules regarding justice collaborators are interpreted differently and appear to be trivialized by law enforcers, giving rise to uncertainty and the principle of legal certainty not being realized. This creates uncertainty and does not realize the principle of legal certainty, which in turn can affect the rights of justice collaborators. Violations of justice collaborators' rights can threaten their security. If violations like this continue to occur, the level of justice collaborators' trust in drug handling may decrease because they are reluctant and afraid to provide information to investigators. The SKB of the Minister of Law and Human Rights, the Attorney General, the Chief of Police, the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Chair of the LPSK was formed to avoid overlapping regulations in determining legal protection for perpetrators who become justice collaborators. However, the different perspectives of law enforcers regarding cooperating actors are what makes it difficult to obtain the rights of cooperating Justice Collaborators. This is also caused by a lack of understanding of the regulations regarding actors working together. So that opens up a gap for different views. One of the inhibiting factors in the implementation of providing protection for Justice Collaborators so far. The SKB of the Minister of Law and Human Rights, the Attorney General, the Chief of Police, the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Chair of the LPSK was formed to avoid overlapping regulations in determining legal protection for perpetrators who become justice collaborators. However, the different perspectives of law enforcers regarding cooperating actors are what makes it difficult to obtain the rights of cooperating Justice Collaborators. This is also caused by a lack of understanding of the regulations regarding actors working together. So that opens up a gap for different views. One of the inhibiting factors in the implementation of providing protection for Justice Collaborators so far

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amirudin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2010.

Bambang Sunggono, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.

Bambang Sunggono, Metodelogi Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta 2003.

Dwi Yanny I. Narkoba Pencegahan dan Penanggulangannya. Elec Media Komputio: Jakarta. 2001.

Eddy O.S Hiariej dalam Firman Wijaya, Whistle Blower dan Justice Collaborator Dalam Perspektif Hukum, Jakarta : Penaku, 2012.

Firman Wijaya. Wistle Blowes dan justice collaborator Dalam Prespektif Hukum, Penaku : Jakarta, 2012.

Harjono. Konstitusi sebagai Rumah Bangsa. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi. 2008.

Hibnu Nugroho, Integralisasi Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia, Media Aksara Prima: Jakarta, 2012.

Laden Marpaung, Asas Teori Praktik Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafik: Jakarta. 2005.

M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Sinar Grafika: Jakarta, 2006.

Moh. Nazir, Metode Penelitian, Jakarta:Ghalia Indonesia,2011.

Muchsin. Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum bagi Investor di Indonesia. Surakarta. Universitas Sebelas Maret. 2003.

Mudji Waluyo. Penanggulangan Penyalahgunaan Bahaya Narkoba, Dit Bimmas Polri: Jakarta. 2001.

Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mataram University Press, Mataram, 2020.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Alumni: Bandung,2005.

Munir Fuady, Aliran Hukum Kritis (Pradigma Ketidakberdayaan Hukum), Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. 2003.

Nana Sudjana, Awal Kusuma, Proposal Penelitian di Perguruan Tinggi, (Bandung: Sinar Baru Algnesindo, 2008

Notohamidjojo, Soal-Soal Pokok Filsafat Hukum, Griya Media: Salatiga, 2011.

Philipus M. Hadjon. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Di Indonesia. Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya: Penanganan oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Bina Ilmu: Surabaya. 1987.

Rusli Muhammad. Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung. 2007.

Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Siti Zubaidah, Penyembuhan Korban Narkoba Melalui Terapi dan Rehabilitasi Terpadu. IAIN Press: Medan. 2011.

Sudarto. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Alumni: Bandung. 1996.

Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Pidana

Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (Herziene Inlandsch Reglement)

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No.35 Tahun 2009, Tentang Narkotika, Jakarta: 12 Oktober 2009.

Undang-Undang No 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No.13 Tahun 2006 Mengenai Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban

Hatarto Pakpahan. “Restorative Justice Terhadap Pengguna Narkotika dan Obat-obatan Berbahaya”, Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, Vol.6, No.2 129- 140 (Desember 2015).

Muhamad Faisal Ruslan Dani Durahman, “Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Turut Serta Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Berdasarkan Pasal 56 Kitab Undang–Undang Hukum Pidana (Kuhp) Dan Upaya Hukum Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan,” Paper Knowledge . Toward A Media History Of Documents 20, No. 3 29- 34 (2013).

Prasetyo, Nugroho, Jurnal, “Kualifikasi Penyalahguna, Pecandu, dan Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Dalam Implementasi Undang-Undang No. 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika, Jurnal Hukum Varia Peradilan, (Desember 2014).

Yassir Arafat. “Prinsip-prinsip Perlindungan Hukum yang Seimbang. Jurnal Rechtens”. Jurnal Rechtens. Vol. 4. No. 2. (2 Desember 2015) 25-39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36835/rechtens.v4i2.117.

Yusuf Saefudin, Agus Raharjo, dan Budiono Budiono” Urgency Of Integrated Assesment On Drugs Crime”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol 17, No. 1 (2017). 40-52. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.1.818.