GAMBARAN SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING PADA MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PSIKOLOGI UNIVERSITAS X
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i3.347Keywords:
Subjective Well Being, Mahasiswa program studi Psikologi, Psychology Study Program StudentAbstract
This research aims to look at the general picture of subjective well-being in terms of cognitive and affective aspects, and the contribution of factors forming subjective well-being to the level of subjective well-being in students of the Psychology study program at University of X. Subjective well-being is explained as an evaluation A person's subjective opinion about their life includes overall satisfaction with life which is characterized by high positive affect and low negative affect (Diener, 1984). The method used in this research is a qualitative method, using semi-structured interviews. The informants in this research were seven students from the Psychology study program at University of X. The results of the research show that of the seven informants it can be concluded that four of them have subjective well-being which is dominant in positive affect and three informants have subjective well-being which is dominant in negative affect. The percentage of informants who felt positive affect and life satisfaction was higher than informants who felt negative affect. Factors that influence subjective well-being in research include self-esteem, self-compassion, meaningfulness of life, social support, and personality. For further research that is interested in conducting research with the same theme, it is hoped that it will deepen the factors that influence subjective well-being in students, such as gender and age. The informants studied also need to have varied backgrounds
Downloads
References
Abdel-Khalek, A. M. 2010. Religiosity, Subjective Well-Being, Self-Esteem, and Anxiety Among Kuwaiti Muslim Adolescents. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 14(2), 129–140.
Allen, A. B., & Leary, M. R. 2010. Self-compassion, Stress, and Coping. Journal Compilation, 4 (2), 107-118.
Anindyati, Fanni. 2010. Hubungan Antara Kecenderungan Kepribadian Ekstravert dan Subjective Well-Being pada Remaja Akhir. SKRIPSI. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. 2003. Does High Self-Esteem cause Better Performance, Interpersonal Success, Happiness or Healthier Lifestyles?. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(1).
Brajša-Žganec, A., Kaliterna-Lipov?an, L., & Hanzec, I. 2017. the Relationship Between Sosial Support and Subjective Well-Being Across the Lifespan. Društvena Istraživanja, 27(1), 47-45.
Carr, A. 2004. Positive Psychology; The Science of Happiness and Human Strengs. New York: Brunner Routledge.
Compton, W. C., & E, Hoffman. 2013. Positive Psychology: The Science of Happiness and Flourishing 2nd edition. USA: Wadsworth.
Diener, E. & Lucas, R.E., 2003. Personality and Subjective Well-Being. Journal. Well-being the foundations of hedonic psychology.
Diener, E. 2000. Subjective Well-Being. The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34- 43. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.34.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. 1999. Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.
Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., & Smith H.L. 2005. Psychological Bulletin, Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress. New York: American Psychological Association
Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., & Smith H.L. 2005. Psychological Bulletin, Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress. New York, American Psychological Association.
Diener, Ed. 1984. Subjective well-being. Psycholgical Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
Diener, Ed., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., Smith, H. L. 1999. Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades Of Progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125 (2) , 276-302.
Gulacti, F. 2010. The Effect of Perceived Social Support on Subjective Well-Being. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2(3844-3849).
Joshanloo, M., & Daemi, F. 2014. Self-Esteem Mediates the Relationship Between Spirituality and Subjective Well-Being in Iran. International Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 115–120.
Liu, H. 2014. Personality, Leisure Satisfaction, and Subjective Well-Being of Serious Leisure Participants. Social Behavior And Personality. An International Journal, 42(7), 1117–1125.
Matsuda, T., Tsuda, A., Kim, E., & Deng, K. 2014. Support and Subjective WellBeing among Japanese, Chinese, and Korean College Students. Psychology, 5:491-499.
Moleong, L. J. 2013. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Neff, K., Rude, S., & Kirkpatrick, K. 2007. An Examination of Self Compassion in Relation To Positive Psychological Functioning and Personality Traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 908-916.
Sarosa, S. 2012. Penelitian Kualitatif : Dasar-Dasar. Jakarta Barat: PT. Indeks.
Siedlecki, Karen L., Timothy A Salthouse., Shigehiro Oishi & Sheena Jeswani. 2013. The Relationship Between Social Support and Subjective Well-Being Across Age. New York. Departement of Psychology.
Sutoyo, A. 2012. Pemahaman Individu (Observasi, Checklist, Interviu, Kuesioner, dan Sosiometri). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Wang, Edward S.-T. and Jia-Rong Yu. 2017. Effect of Product Attribute Beliefs of Ready-to-Drink Coffee Beverages on Consumer-Perceived Value and Repurchase Intention , British Food Journal, 118(12): 2963 – 2980.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Lina Nikmatul Karimah, Anniez Rachmawati Musslifah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.