KEPASTIAN HUKUM PEMBERIAN GANTI KERUGIAN MELALUI PUTUSAN PRA PERADILAN : STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 10/PID.PRA/2022/PN.MTR

M. Daffa Wildan  Arzaky; Tanudjaja Tanudjaja

doi:10.53363/bureau.v3i1.284

Authors

M. Daffa Wildan Arzaky Universitas Narotama Surabaya
Tanudjaja Tanudjaja Universitas Narotama Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.284

Keywords:

Theory of Justice, Legal Certainty, Compensation, Pretrial, Teori Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum, Ganti Kerugian, Praperadilan

Abstract

The act of law enforcement officers arresting, detaining, prosecuting or being tried against someone without a reason based on the law is an act that is detrimental to human rights. For these actions, the Criminal Procedure Code guarantees legal protection for someone who has experienced acts committed by law enforcement officials without reasons based on the law through a pretrial compensation mechanism. One of the interesting decisions occurred in Decision Number 10/Pid.Pra/2022/Pn.Mtr concerning Pretrial Compensation. The decision granted the plaintiff's demands even though the applicant did not include evidence to corroborate his request to obtain material compensation. The formulation of the problem in this research is what is the ratio decidendi in pre-trial decision NUMBER 10/PID.PRA/2022/PN.MTR regarding compensation? and what are the legal remedies for case NUMBER 10/PID.PRA/2022/PN.MTR. The research method used is normative juridical research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that the legal considerations carried out by the judge using the ratio decidendi theory are in accordance with the theory of justice put forward by Aristotle and John Rawls where the judge has rendered a decision in favor of the applicant's request to obtain material losses even though the applicant is unable to show evidence at trial. Then regarding the legal consequences after the pretrial decision, it is known that the government, in this case the ministry of finance, does not yet have a legal basis governing the mechanism for granting compensation in accordance with the mandate of Government Regulation Number 92 of 2015. For this reason, the applicant has the potential to lose his rights again

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad Rifai, Penemuan Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2010.

Andi Hamzah, Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1985.

Anang Shopan Tornadi dan Muhammad Hendri Nova, Praperadilan dan Hakim Tunggal, Borneo Development Project Bajarmasin, 2020.

Apriyanto Nusa dan Ramadhan Kasim, Hukum Acara Pidana, Teori, Asas Dan Perkembangannya Pasca Putusan Konstitusi, Setara Press, Malang, 2019.

Dio Wicaksono, dkk, Penelitian Format Putusan Pengadilan Indonesia: Studi Empat Lingkungan Peradilan Di Bawah Mahkamah Agung, Badan Penerbit FHUI, Jakarta, 2020.

Jaholden, Praperadilan Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, AA Rizky, Serang, 2021.

John Rawls, Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, United States of America, 1999.

Laila M. Rasyid dan Herinawati, Pengantar Hukum Acara Perdata,Unimal Press, Lhokseumawe, 2015.

Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mataram University Press, Mataram, 2020.

Ridwan Mansyur, et al, Kompilasi Penerapan Hukum oleh Hakim dan Strategi Pemberantasan Korupsi, Biro Hukum dan Humas Badan Urusan Administrasi Republik Indonesia Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, 2016.

Sertlika Aprita dan Rio Adhitya, Filsafat Hukum, Rajawali Pers, Depok, 2020.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2009.

Suyanto, Hukum Acara Pidana, Zifatama Jawara, Sidoarja, 2018.

Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2002.

Yulia, Hukum Acara Perdata, Unimal Press, Lhokseumawe, 2018.

Amin, R., Manalu, I., Van Hemert, W. A., & Al Aziz, M. F. (2022). Penyelesaian Ganti Kerugian Dalam Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Penetapan Praperadilan: Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 8(1), 19-32.

Djanggih, H., & Saefudin, Y. (2017). Pertimbangan Hakim Pada Putusan Praperadilan: Studi Putusan Nomor: 09/PID. PRA/2016/PN. Lwk Tentang Penghentian Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Politik Uang. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 17(3), 413-425.

Ihsani, A. N. (2017). Urgensi Perluasan Objek Praperadilan Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Perlindungan Hak Asasi Tersangka. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 66-85.

Muntaha, M. (2017). Pengaturan Praperadilan dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 29(3), 461-473.

Sitoresmi, A. S. (2019). Sanksi Aparat Penegak Hukum Yang Melanggar Kuhap Dalam Menanggulangi Kejahatan. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 8(2), 68-73.

Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 tentang Kode Etik Profesi Dan Komisi Kode Etik Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.

Putusan Nomor 10/Pid.Pra/2022/Pn.Mtr

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana

Mas Hushendar, Tuntutan Ganti Kerugian Dalam Perkara Praperadilan,

https://badilum.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel-hukum/2990-tuntutan-ganti-kerugian-dalam-perkara-praperadilan.html , diakses pada 20 Desember 2022.

Stefanus Anto, “LBH: Kasus Salah Tangkap Berulang”, https://www.kompas.id/baca/metro/2022/03/07/lbh-kasus-salah-tangkap-berulang, diakses pada 12 November 2022.