PENGATURAN PEMBERIAN RESTITUSI DALAM SUATU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 22-K/PMT-II/AD/II/2022)

Anissa  Rahmawati; Otto  Yudianto

doi:10.53363/bureau.v3i2.273

Authors

Anissa Rahmawati Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Otto Yudianto Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i2.273

Keywords:

Crime, Victims, Restitution, Tindak Pidana, Korban, Restitusi

Abstract

Providing a justice or legal protection for victims of criminal acts is a form of right owned by the victim and the victim's family which can be called the right of restitution, which aims to alleviate suffering and losses caused by a crime. This study aims to determine the importance of granting restitution in a crime of murder. In Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims (UU PSK), it is a concrete form that the Indonesian state supports protecting and providing justice for victims of a crime, for state accountability to the people. As for the processes or phases pertaining to the application for the awarding of rights to compensation and rights to restitution by victims, their families, or their proxies via the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK), they have the right to petition to court. Procedures for Completing Applications and Granting Restitution and Compensation to Crime Victims, as outlined in Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 1 of 2022. The Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in Article 98 paragraph (1) regulates the merger of cases for compensation. This writing finds the fact that in criminal justice in Indonesia it is still rarely applied by judges in deciding cases of merging compensation claims and in granting restitution to victims of criminal acts which is a form of state responsibility regarding effective protection of human rights (HAM) for victims. However, related to this, in practice, in the provision of restitution, there is still a lack of supervision by the LPSK towards victims after receiving restitution, because the available data is inadequate, as well as a lack of Human Resources (HR) and the lack of a supporting budget in granting restitution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Audina, N. A. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Pelanggaran HAM berat ( Tinjauan Hukum Nasional dan Hukum Internasional). Legalite?: Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v5i1.1464

Dennis F, D. (2018). Restoring Restitution: The Role Of Proximate Causation In Child Pornography Possession Cases Where Restitution Is Sought. Cardozo Law Review , 33(2), 268.

Farhana. (2010). Aspek Perdagangan Orang Di Indonesia (Human Trafficking). Sinar Grafika.

Husin, K., & Husin, B. R. (2016). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia (D. M. Listianingsih, Ed.). Sinar Grafika. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=cOWCEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA48&hl=id&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=false

Kapten Chk Agustono, S. (n.d.). Penggabungan Perkara Gugatan Ganti Rugi Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 Tentang Peradilan Militer. Retrieved 24 December 2022, from https://www.dilmiltama.go.id/home/e-journal/PENGGABUNGAN_PERKARA.pdf

Magistri, N. R. C., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana Penusukan Dalam Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1).

Marasabessy, F. (2016). RESTITUSI BAGI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA: SEBUAH TAWARAN MEKANISME BARU. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 45(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol45.no1.9

Mulyadi, L. (2012). Upaya Hukum Yang Dilakukan Korban Kejahatan Dikaji Dari Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. 01(1). https://jurnalhukumdanperadilan.org/index.php/jurnalhukumperadilan/article/view/145/156

Palekahelu, J. D., Nasution, K., & Yudianto, O. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal YUSTITIA , 21(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.0324/yustitia.v21i1.813

Pieter, S., & Silambi, E. D. (2019). Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Ditinjau Dari Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Restorative Justice , 3(No 1), 77–78.

Soediro, S. (2019). Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Amerika Serikat dengan Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Kosmik Hukum, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v19i1.4083

Sujarwo, H. (2020). PEMBAHARUAN RESTITUSI KEPADA KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN BERDASARKAN NILAI-NILAI HUKUM ISLAM. Manarul Qur’an: Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Islam, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.32699/mq.v20i1.1614

Surbakti, N. (2011). Mediasi Penal Sebagai Terobosan Alternatif Perlindungan Hak Korban Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Hukum , 14(1), 97.

Tajuddin, M. A., & Tarsan, I. R. (2019). Pemenuhan Hak Keluarga Korban Terkait Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan dalam Perspektif Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurisprudentie?: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v6i2.11072

Wajdi, F., & Imran. (2021). Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia dan Tanggung Jawab Negara Terhadap Korban. Jurnal Komisi Yudisial, 14(No 2), 232–234. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.29123/jy.v14i2.445

Wijaya, I. A., & Purwadi, H. (2018). PEMBERIAN RESTITUSI SEBAGAI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v6i2.17728