URGENSI PEMBATASAN MASA JABATAN ANGGOTA DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA

Ferdy Putra  Ernawan; Ahmad Sholikhin  Ruslie

doi:10.53363/bureau.v3i2.235

Authors

Ferdy Putra Ernawan Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i2.235

Keywords:

Anggota DPR dan DPD, Pembatasan Masa Jabatan, Members of DPR and DPD, Term Limitations

Abstract

This study aims to provide a limitation on the need for rules that limit the periodization of the term of office of DPR and DPD members. In many cases, people who have been in power for a long time abuse their power. Type of Research This type of research is normative legal research or library research, namely research conducted using literature, either in the form of books, scientific journals, mass media and the internet as well as other references. There is a legal issue, so there needs to be a rule limiting the periodization of the term of office for members of the DPR and DPD. In many cases, people who have been in power for a long time abuse their power. Whoever holds power and no matter how well it is executed, has the seeds of potential power or ability as Lord Acton's classic saying about power tends to corrupt, but absolute power corrupts absolutely meaning,“power tends to corrupt, and absolute power must corrupt absolutely”. undeniable. Government administrators place themselves above the people and regard themselves as the source of all prevailing order. Revisions to the terms of office for the DPR and DPD need to be realized immediately, bearing in mind the urgency in terms of legal justice, the poor dimension of democracy, and leadership regeneration. In order to fulfill the need to realize an electoral system based on a democratic constitution

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benar, Y. (n.d.). KASUS SETYA NOVANTO KORUPSI E-KTP DITINJAU DARI SUDUT PANDANG ACTUS HUMANUS DAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP REFLEKTIF DARI HATI NURANI.

Chaidir, E. (2007). Negara hukum, demokrasi, dan konstalasi ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Kreasi Total Media.

Indrayana, D. (2007). Amandemen UUD 1945: Antara mitos dan pembongkaran. Mizan Pustaka.

Isra, S. (2010). Pergeseran fungsi legislasi: menguatnya model legislasi parlementer dalam sistem presidensial Indonesia. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Kambu, W. M. (2021). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TENTANG HAK ASASI MANUSIA BERDASARKAN PASAL 28D AYAT 3 UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945. LEX ET SOCIETATIS, 9(1).

Kosandi, M. (2022). Kontestasi Politik dan Perimbangan Kekuasaan dalam Perumusan dan Implementasi UU MD3 2014. Jurnal Politik, 1(1), 5.

Maggalatung, A. S. (2015). Indonesia negara hukum demokratis bukan negara kekuasaan otoriter.

Power, T., Warburton, E., & Di, D. (n.d.-b). Demokrasi di Indonesia-FINAL OFFSET PALING FINAL.indd. www.penerbitkpg.id

Putra, G. S. S. J. A. (2014). Membangun Politik Hukum Pemilu yang Demokratis dengan Membumikan Konsep Negara Hukum Pancasila. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 43(2), 197–203.

Suriadinata, V. (2017). PEMBATASAN PERIODISASI KEANGGOTAAN LEMBAGA PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: ALETHEA, 1(1), 78–94.

UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945. (n.d.).

Wahyudi, A. (2014). Ilmu Negara dan Tipologi Kepemimpinan Negara. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wiredarme, W., Wibowo, G. D. H., & Kaharuddin, K. (2018a). PENGATURAN PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH DALAM DINAMIKA SISTEM DEMOKRASI DI INDONESIA KE DEPAN. Pustaka Bangsa (Anggota IKAPI).