TANGGUNGJAWAB  PIDANA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN: PUTUSAN PERKARA NOMOR 590/Pid.B/2019/PN Sim

R.Rivaldi  Aldanta; Frans  Simangunsong

doi:10.53363/bureau.v3i1.223

Authors

R.Rivaldi Aldanta Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Frans Simangunsong Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.223

Keywords:

Putusan Hakim, Pelaku, Tanggung Jawab, verdict judge, perpetrator, responsibility

Abstract

A perpetrator is one who deliberately performs acts prohibited by the law, and can be performed alone or in groups with a supposed violation of the norm and is expressly referred to as a crime. Especially crimes common to social life are theft, resulting in large Numbers of victims. Stealing is one of the crimes of crime that can harm many because of losing their property or possessions. The responsibility for theft is based on the book of criminal law that the perpetrator must be responsible if the act meets the key elements that can be met according to article 362 of the criminal code and several others will be used asa consideration in using the chapters relating to theft by law enforcement. Interestingly, in the case of the theft, it was very rare for any criminal to have been convicted for his crimes on an estate that could enmeshed the theft by taking measures of plantation goods that were associated with the crime taken in the form of gum ram of a low grade item. But with the object of its object of very small value, the perpetrator can still be convicted. The study employed a normative-normative juridical method of legislation, conceptual, and case studies that doubtless dealt with responsibility to perpetrators of theft crimes. This study shows that law enforcement provides knowledge to all societies that the punishment for criminal crimes of theft still applies to anyone who commits a felony even with stolen goods or objects is of very little value, This can be taught that it still applies to idlers who are accused of theft, such as by legislation - the plantation law against the repurchaser of gum rambody who deliberately takes the plantation that belongs to a Japanese company standing in Indonesia and is therefore breaking the law

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anugrah Roby. 2019. ‘PEMAAFAN KORBAN DITINJAU DARI TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA’, Ilmu Hukum : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, 8.1: 20–35 https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/jih.v8i1.5939

Erlandi, Gede Agastia. 2018. ‘PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA TERKAIT PENGHINAAN AGAMA’, Jurist - Diction, 1.2: 537–56 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v1i2.11007

Fauzi, M.Yusuf, and Zainab Ompu Jainah. 2022. ‘ANALISIS PERTANGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA PERCOBAAN PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN(Studi Putusan Nomor:122 /Pid.B/2021/PN.Kbu)’, Suara Keadilan, 23.1: 95–118 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24176/sk.v23i1.8558

Hikmawati Puteri. 2016. ‘PIDANA PENGAWASAN SEBAGAI PENGGANTI PIDANA BERSYARAT MENUJU KEADILAN RESTORATIF’, Negara Hukum, 7.1: 71–88 https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v7i1.923

Irianty, Devy Inovany, Olga A Pangkerego, and Evie Sompie. 2021. ‘KAJIAN YURIDIS TENTANG TANGGUNG JAWAB PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN BERDASARKAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA’, Lex Crimen, 10.7: 177–86 https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/35010 [accessed 5 December 2022]

Ismanto, Jaya Ade, Albisar Madiasa, Mulyadi, Mahmud, Siregar Mahmud. 2022. ‘PENERAPAN PASAL 107 HURUF (D) UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 39 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PERKEBUNAN UNTUK MEMINIMALISIR TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN KELAPA SAWITDI PT. PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA IV(StudiPutusan Nomor158/Pid.B/2020/PN.Sim, 303/Pid.B/2020/PN.Sim, 324/Pid.B/2020/PN.Sim)’, Locus Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 2.1: 58–64 https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/jkih/article/view/23 [accessed 5 December 2022]

Kamtono, Hery. 2021. ‘PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ANAK TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DENGAN KEKERASAN (Studi Putusan Perkara Nomor 02/Pid.Sus.Anak/2020/PN.Sgn)’, Dinamika Hukum, 12.2: 49–62 https://ejurnal.unisri.ac.id/index.php/Dinamika_Hukum/article/view/7330 [accessed 6 December 2022]

Laoritan, Evan, Frankiano B Randang, and Hironimus Taroreh. 2021. ‘TINDAK PIDANA MENADAH HASIL USAHA PERKEBUNAN YANG DIPEROLEH DARI PENJARAHAN ATAU PENCURIAN’, LEX PRIVATUM, IX.5: 188–96 http://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/33511 [accessed 5 December 2022]

M.A Ferdiansyah, and Frans Simangunsong. 2022. ‘PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PELAKU BINARY OPTION TERHADAP HUKUM’, 2.2: 628–48 https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i2.93

Madari, Muhammad Soma Karya. 2013. ‘Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan Dan Jumlah Denda KUHP Terhadap Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencurian’, Cita Hukum, 1.2: 335–50 https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i2.3000

Martua, Abastian, and Tawang Dian Adriawan Daeng. 2020. ‘PENERAPAN SANKSI TERHADAP KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DALAM KUHP DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERKEBUNAN DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN SIMALUNGUN NOMOR 590/ PID.B/2019/PN SIM’, Hukum Adigama, 3.1: 866–84 https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/adigama/article/view/8930 [accessed 21 December 2022]

Rivaldy Muhammad Fauzar, and Rahmawati Mety. 2018. ‘KONSEP SANKSI PIDANA PENJARA CICILAN SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PEMENJARAAN BARU DALAM UPAYA MENGATASI OVER CAPACITY/KELEBIHAN KAPASITAS DI DALAM LEMBAGA PERMASYARAKATAN’, Hukum Adigama, 1.1: 1–25 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2159

Simamora, Lisa, and Irene Svinarky. 2020. ‘ANALISIS YURIDIS TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DILIHAT DARI PERMA NOMOR 02 TAHUN 2012 DAN KUHP’, SCIENTIA JOURNAL : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 2.2 https://ejournal.upbatam.ac.id/index.php/scientia_journal/article/view/2179 [accessed 6 December 2022]

Simangunsong, Frans. 2014. ‘PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA ( Studi Kasus Di Kepolisian Resor Surakarta )’, Journal RECHSTAAT Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum UNSA, 8.1: 1–10 https://ejournal.unsa.ac.id/index.php/rechstaat/article/view/7 [accessed 21 December 2022]

Susan. 2019. ‘TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENJARAHAN DAN PENCURIAN DI BIDANG PERKEBUNAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF PENEGAKAN HUKUM’, Wasaka Hukum, 7.2: 282–98 https://ojs.stihsa-bjm.ac.id/index.php/wasaka/article/view/20 [accessed 5 December 2022]

Sutriadi Deawit, and Simangunsong Frans. 2022. ‘DINAMIKA PERSINGGUNGAN HUKUM ADMINISTRASI DAN HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA’, Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 3.2: 5013–28 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v3i2.1768

Sutriani, Komang, Ida Ayu Putu Widiati, and Ni Made Sukaryati Karma. 2022. ‘Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Pencurian Yang Dilakukan Oleh Seorang Kleptomania’, Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 3.1 (Universitas Warmadewa): 68–72 https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.3.1.4626.68-72

Utami, Feby Reski, and Hamsir Hamsir. 2021. ‘Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ringan Berdasarkan Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan Dan Jumlah Denda’, Alauddin Law Development Journal, 3.1: 171–77 https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v3i1.15093

Walandouw, Rony A, Diana Pangemanan R, and Pondaag Hendrik. 2020. ‘UNSUR MELAWAN HUKUM YANG SUBJEKTIF DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN PASAL 362 KUHP’, Lex Crimen, 9.3: 249–57 https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/30832 [accessed 21 December 2022]

Wenno, Valentino, Johb Dirk Pasalbessy, and Hattu Jacob. 2021. ‘Pertanggung Jawaban Hukum Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyuapan’, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1.9: 943–60 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v1i9.814

Wicaksono, Haryo, Budiyono, and Haryanto Dwiatmodjo. 2021. ‘PENERAPAN PASAL 363 KUHP TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DALAMKEADAAN MEMBERATKAN (Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cilacap Nomor 235/Pid.B/2015/PN.Clp)APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 363 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THEFT IN AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES (Juridical Review of Cilacap District Court Decision No. 235/Pid.B/2015/PN.Clp)’, Soedirman Law Review, 3.1: 150–60 http://journal.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/SLR/article/view/127 [accessed 6 December 2022]