KEKUATAN HUKUM ALAT BANTU PENDETEKSI MATA SEBAGAI ALAT PEMBUKTIAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.206Keywords:
Alat Bantu Pendeteksi Mata, Pembuktian, Alat Bukti, EyeDetection, Verification, EvidenceAbstract
As time goes on, the use of eye detection tools has become more widespread, both in the workplace and in the legal process in Indonesia. While these tools are a relatively new technology in Indonesia and have both benefits and drawbacks that must be considered, their importance in collecting relevant and reliable evidence in court cannot be denied. The use of eye detection tools can facilitate the investigation process and provide a higher level of legal certainty for those involved. However, there are still issues that need to be addressed regarding the use of eye detection tools as evidence in legal proceedings, such as the lack of regulation in Indonesian law. Therefore, it is important to have a deeper understanding of the legal status of eye detection tools in the criminal judicial process in Indonesia. The goal of this research is to examine the legal strength of eye detection tools as a support tool in the criminal judicial process in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical, involving an analysis of relevant laws and journals. In this research, there are issues that need to be addressed, including the lack of regulation on the legal status of eye detection tools as evidence in criminal proceedings and the lack of regulation in Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Criminal Procedure Code. Despite this, eye detection tools are widely used in various places, such as hospitals, offices, and others. The public sees the existence of eye detection tools as providing certainty and security in terms of data protection."
Downloads
References
Y. N. Eato, “Keabsahan Alat Bukti Dan Barang Bukti Pada Perkara Pidana,” Lex Crim. 6, vol. 2, 2017.
S. Saleh, M. Akhir, dan S. B, “Eksploitasi Pekerja Anak Pemulung,” Equilib. J. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 1, hal. 10–20, 2019, doi: 10.26618/equilibrium.v6i1.1793.
D. R. Monica, “Penggunaan Alat Bantu Pendeteksi Kebohongan (Lie Detector) Dalam Proses Penyidikan,” Univ. Lampung, 2018.
L. M. Prof. Dr. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, S.H., M.S., “PENELITIAN HUKUM,” Jakarta: Kencana, 2005, hal. 33.
Fachrul Rozi, “SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PROSES PERSIDANGAN PADA PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA,” J. Yuridis Unaja, vol. 1, 2018.
B. W. Endah Puspita Sari, Sihabudin, “KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN AFFIDAVIT SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI SURAT,” Univ. Brawijaya Malang, vol. 2, no. 2, hal. 154–164, 2016.
Rahman Amin, Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana dan Perdata. Sleman: Deepublish Publisher, 2020.
B. I. J. M.S, “KEKUATAN ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI YANG BERBEDA ANTARA BERITA ACARA PEMERIKSAAN DI PENYIDIK DENGAN KETERANGAN SAKSI DI PERSIDANGAN TERHADAP PUTUSAN HAKIM NOMOR 465/PID.B/2009/PN.BJN,” Univ. Brawijaya, 2017.
D. S. Angelo Luntungan Geraldo, Michael Barama, “Surat Sebagai Alat Bukti Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana,” Lex Crim., vol. VII, no. 5, hal. 8, 2018, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/20542
A. Chazawi, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana II. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2017.
Moeljatno, Hukum acara pidana -Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada, 1978.
P. P. Kartika, “Data Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang,” Indones. J. Crim. Law, vol. 1, no. 1, hal. 39, 2019.
C. Law, A. Hukum, dan R. Aditama, “Dikdik M.Arief Mansur dan Elisatris Gultom,2011, Cyber Law Aspek Hukum Teknologi Informasi ,Bandung,Refika Aditama,hlm.22. 1 1,” hal. 1–17, 2011.
E. Makarim, “Tindak Pidana terkait dengan Komputer dan Internet: Suatu Kajian Pidana Materiil dan Formil,” Univ. Indones., vol. 1, 2017.
Herlina Hanum Harahap, “Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang,” Amaliah J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 4, no. 2, hal. 186–190, 2020, doi: 10.32696/ajpkm.v4i2.551.
N. Isima, “KEDUDUKAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PIDANA,” Gorontalo Law Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, hal. 179–189, 2022.
Anwar Kurniadi, “Pemilihan Ibukota Negara Republik Indonesia Baru Berdasarkan Tingkat Kebencanaan,” vol. Vol. 5 No., 2019.
R. Atmasasmita, Sistem peradilan pidana kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
K. A. C. T. Dewi, “Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia,” Kertha Wichara, vol. 8, no. 7, hal. 1–18, 2019, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/54706
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Wahyudi, Hari Soeskandi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.