PROSEDUR PENETAPAN TERSANGKA PASCA DIPERLUASNYA OBJEK PRAPERADILAN: STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 01/PID.PRA/2022/PN. JBG

Winny  Savitri; Frans  Simangunsong

doi:10.53363/bureau.v3i1.167

Authors

Winny Savitri Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Frans Simangunsong Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.167

Keywords:

Praperadilan, Tersangka, Penetapan, Pemeriksaan, Pretrial, Suspect, Determination, Examination

Abstract

Pretrial agencies aim to monitor the acts of coercive efforts made by investigators or public prosecutors against suspects. Along with the development of the pretrial object in terms of the determination of suspects regulated in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21/PUU-XII/2014 dated April 28, 2015 which decided the determination of suspects as pretrial objects has created its own legal problems. Especially on the difficulty of distinguishing between proof for pretrial and proof for the subject matter. With the acceptance of the determination of the suspect as a pretrial object, the pretrial judge must test the evidence as a minimum requirement for the determination of the suspect in the pretrial hearing process. The aim of this research is to realize how the procedure for determining suspects after the expansion of pretrial objects. This study applied normative juridical methods based on primary and secondary data through literature studies. This research result is that the procedure for determining suspects must be complemented by an examination of potential suspects with the need for laws and regulations as implementers of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 to be used as guidelines by law enforcement officials, namely investigators, both prosecutors and police in determining suspects so that there is no multi-interpretation in phrase 2 (two) evidence and accompanied by examination of potential suspects

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Darwin, D., Dahlan, D., & Suhaimi, S. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Praperadilan dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana. JURNAL MERCATORIA, 12(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.31289/MERCATORIA.V12I1.2363

Effendi, E. (2020). Relevansi Pemeriksaan Calon Tersangka sebelum Penetapan Tersangka. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 3(2), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.22437/UJH.3.2.267-288

Firmansyah, S. H., Farid, A. M., & Artikel, R. (2022). Politik Hukum Praperadilan sebagai Lembaga Perlindungan Hak Tersangka Ditinjau dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 mengenai Penetapan Tersangka. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.18196/JPHK.V3I2.15195

Kaidah, J. H., & Sebayang, S. (2020). Praperadilan Sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Perlindungan Hak-Hak Tersangka Dalam Pemeriksaan Di Tingkat Penyidikan (Studi Pengadilan Negeri Medan). Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 19(2), 329–383. https://doi.org/10.30743/JHK.V19I2.2445

Kusumastuti, E. (2019). Penetapan Tersangka Sebagai Objek Praperadilan. MNC Publishing.

M.A.S, W. J., & Simangunsong, F. (2022). MAKNA KEPENTINGAN UMUM DIDALAM DEPONERING. Bureaucracy Journal?: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 2(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.53363/BUREAU.V2I2.32

Made, I., Kusuma, W. W., Sepud, M., Made, N., & Karma, S. (2020). Upaya Hukum Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 1(2), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.22225/JUINHUM.1.2.2438.73-77

Michael, T., & Kleden, K. L. (2018). MENYOAL PEMAHAMAN HAK DALAM PRINSIP-PRINSIP YOGYAKARTA 2007. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. https://doi.org/10.30996/DIH.V0I0.1794

Rahman, W., Majapahit Nomor, J., & Tenggara Barat, N. (2019). WEWENANG PRAPERADILAN: MEMERIKSA DAN MEMUTUS PENETAPAN STATUS TERSANGKA. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE’JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 4(1), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.35706/DEJURE.V4I1.1868

Ramadhan, R., Dan, H., Fadlian, A., Singaperbangsa, U., Korespondensi, K., Rio, :, & Hutasuhut, R. (2021). PRAPERADILAN ATAS PENETAPAN TERSANGKA DILUAR KETENTUAN KUHAP. JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW, 13(2), 91–99.

Roberts, K., Prodi, M. H., Hukum, I., Hukum, F., Batam, U., Intelkam, D., & Riau, P. (2019). PERLUASAN KEWENANGAN PRAPERADILAN SEBAGAI LEMBAGA PENCARI KEADILAN PASCAPUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSITUSI NOMOR 21/PUU-XII/2014. CIVITAS (JURNAL PEMBELAJARAN DAN ILMU CIVIC), 2(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.36987/CIVITAS.V2I1.1075

Sengi, E. (2022). Benarkah Praperadilan Menguji Aspek Formil (Analisis Hukum Penetapan Tersangka dalam Putusan Nomor: 01/Pid.Pra//2021/PN.Tob). Wajah Hukum, 6(2), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.33087/WJH.V6I2.901

Sofyan, H., Ali, D., Suhaimi, S., & Mansari, M. (2020). Penolakan Permohonan Praperadilan Terhadap Penetapan Tersangka dan Penyitaan (Kajian Putusan Nomor 01/Pra.Pid/2016/PN-Mbo). Media Syari’ah?: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial, 21(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.22373/JMS.V21I1.3923

Sutriadi, D., & Simangunsong, F. (2022). DINAMIKA PERSINGGUNGAN HUKUM ADMINISTRASI DAN HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 3(2), 5013–5028. https://doi.org/10.47492/JIP.V3I2.1768

View of Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Positif Legislator atas Putusan Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 tentang Penambahan Objek Penetapan Status Tersangka dalam Praperadilan. (n.d.).

Wijaya, F. (2022). Pergeseran Paradigma Dalam Praperadilan: Menyongsong Keadilan Prosedural Yang Substantif. Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues, 1(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.32734/NLR.V1I1.9606