PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PIHAK KREDITUR YANG MEMPEKERJAKAN DEBTCOLLECTOR DALAM PENYELESAIAN KREDIT MACET

Marcellina  Denisanjaya; Yovita Arie  Mangesti

doi:10.53363/bureau.v2i1.159

Authors

Marcellina Denisanjaya Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Yovita Arie Mangesti Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i1.159

Keywords:

creditors, bad debts, Liability, kreditur, kredit macet, Pertanggungjawaban

Abstract

In this study, it will examine the criminal liability of creditors who employ debtcollectors in collecting bad debts. Card-Based Payment Instruments (APMK) regulated in PBI (Bank Indonesia Regulation) Number 14 of 2012, one example of a payment instrument that is often used by the public is the use of Credit Cards. With this payment instrument, it can pose several risks for the community, a problem that often occurs is delays or overdue in paying credit card bills. Until it finally causes credit bottlenecks in payments and also the nominal collection that is increasing due to late fees. The existence of credit congestion can cause other problems for the creditor and the debtor. In general, in the event of a bad debt, the creditor will use the services of a Debtcollector as a third party to collect debts. Debtcollector as a third party charged by the creditor (bank) in collecting debts to the debtor, but the power of attorney that has been given makes the debtcollector do various ways of collecting. There are some debt collection individuals who commit arbitrary acts or unlawful acts in collection. In this study, it uses normative juridical research methods with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study show that the form of criminal liability of creditors who employ debtcollectors can be in the form of imprisonment and/or fines of a certain amount of money for compensation to the aggrieved party. It has not been clearly regulated in the laws and regulations regarding the form of criminal liability of creditors in hiring debtcollectors who commit unlawful acts at the time of debt collection.

Downloads

References

Habib, I., Edorita, W., & Effendi, E. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pihak Leasing Yang Mempekerjakan Debt Collector Dalam Menyelesaikan Piutang Dengan Melakukan Penganiayaan Di Kepolisian Resort Kota Pekanbaru (Doctoral dissertation, Riau University).

Kurniawan, Y. (2021). REKONSTRUKSI PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI PIHAK LEASING DALAM MEMPEKERJAKAN DEBT COLLECTOR UNTUK MENYELESAIKAN HUTANG YANG BERBASIS KEADILAN (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang).

Rofi’i, M. (2012). Kajian Tentang Tindak Pidana yang Dilakukan oleh Debt Collector yang Diperintah Bank Menagih Utang Nasabah Kartu Kredit.

NISAR, U. U. TINJAUAN KRIMINOLOGIS TERHADAP KEJAHATAN PENGANIAYAAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH DEBT COLLECTOR DI KOTA MAKASSAR.

THOIF, M. KEJAHATAN PENGANIAYAAN DILAKUKAN DEBT COLLECTOR DITINJAUAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999.

Liono, C. E. F. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penarikan Barang Jaminan Fidusia Secara Paksa Oleh Leasing Melalui Debt Collector Yang Ditinjau Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Lex Privatum, 9(1).

FEBRIANDY, M. (2021). SISTEM PEMIDANAAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN ATAU PERAMPASAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH PIHAK KETIGA DARI PT. ADIRA FINANCE (Studi Putusan No. 141/Pid. B/2019/PN. PKY).

Saepulloh, Y., Rosadi, D., & Riswaya, A. R. (2021). SISTEM PELAPORAN KUNJUNGAN DEBT COLLECTOR KARTU KREDIT BERBASIS TRACKING GPS. Jurnal Computech & Bisnis, 15(1), 1-6.

SY?KUR, ?. (2017). ?N?LISIS PERB?NDING?N C?R? PEN?GIH?N HUT?NG P?D? LE?SING D?N KOPR?SI SIMP?N PINJ?M (Doctoral dissertation, UNISNU).