AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU USAHA YANG MELAKUKAN PELANGGARAN HAK ATAS MEREK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i1.157Keywords:
Violations of Trademark Rights, Marks, Business Actors, Pelanggaran Hak Atas Merek, Merek, Pelaku UsahaAbstract
Brand is an important thing that is owned by business actors and is often said to be an asset of a business. For this reason, one of the intellectual property rights that the state is required to protect is the mark. Law No. 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection and Law No. 20 of 2016 Concerning Marks and Geographical Indications control brand rules in Indonesia. However, even though it has been protected, various trademark protections still occur and are mostly carried out by business actors. This study aims to investigate the legal consequences and accountability of business actors who abuse trademark rights. This study uses normative research methods and qualitative research approaches. The study's findings demonstrate that business actors who violate trademark rights may face civil or criminal liability from the original brand owner. The responsibility of business actors who violate trademark rights is regulated in the Trademark Law where the perpetrators can be subject to prison sanctions or witness compensation
Downloads
References
Bahfiarti, T.(Tuti). 2013. Pengelolaan Kesan Etnik Bugis Dalam Adaptasi Diri Dengan Budaya Sunda (Hasanuddin University)
Budiono, Herlien. 2006. Asas Keseimbangan Bagi Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia - Hukum Perjanjian Berlandaskan Asas-Asas Wigati Indonesia (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti)
Collin, Craig. 2014. Intellectual Property (Australia: Lexis Nexis)
Finnis, John M. 2011. Natural Law and Natural Rights, Dalam Filsafat Hukum Jilid I( Legal Philosophy Volume. I) (Jakarta: UI Press)
Hartono, C.F.G. Sunaryati. 1994. Penelitian Hukum Di Indonesia Pada Akhir Abad Ke-20,Cet.1 (Bandung: Alumni)
Haryani. 2010. Prosedur Mengurus HaKI Yang Benar. (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia)
Huang. 2018. ‘Empirical Analysis of Australian Trademark Infringement Decisions: Implications for the US Trademark Use Debate’, Santa Clara High Tech, 35.1
Jened, Rahmi. 2015. Hukum Merek (Trademark Law) Dalam Era Global Dan Inegrasi Ekonomi (Jakarta: PT Kharisma Putra Utama)
Mamuji, Soerjono Soekanto & Sri. 1995. Metode Penelitian Normatif (Jakarta: Rajawali)
Maulana, Insan. 1999. Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Di Indonesia Dari Masa Ke Masa (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti)
McGuide, Zain Adnan & Brett. 2008. Indonesia Progress in IP Protection-But Much Still to Be Done (Jakarta: Rouse & Co International)
Moestert, Frederick. W. 1997. Famous and WellKnown Marks (United Kingdom: Butterworths)
Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Carraher, S. M., & Shi, W. S. 2017. ‘History and the Debate over Intellectual Property’, Management and Organization Review, 13.1: 15–38
Purwaningsih. 2005. Perkembangan Hukum Intellectual Proverty Rights Kajian Hukum Terhdap Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual Dan Kajian Komperatif Hukum Paten (Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia)
Rizaldi, Julius. 2009. Perlindungan Kemasan Produk Merek Terkenal Terhadap Persaingan Curang. (Bandung: PT Alumni)
Sudaryat. 2010. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Bandung: Oase Media)
Tam, Phan Ngoc. 2011. ‘Well- Known Trademark Protection, A Comparative Study Between the Laws of European Union and Vietnam’ (Faculty of Law Lund University)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Desy Salsa Biela, Abraham Ferry Rosando

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.