KEBIJAKAN KEJAKSAAN AGUNG RI TENTANG PENGHAPUSAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI BAWAH 50 JUTA DITINJAU DARI RESTORATIVE JUSTICE

Wahyu Danang  Subiantoro; Hari  Soeskandi

doi:10.53363/bureau.v2i1.147

Authors

Wahyu Danang Subiantoro Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Hari Soeskandi Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i1.147

Keywords:

Keadilan Restoratif, Peraturan Kebijakan (beleidsregel), Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia, Restorative Justice, Policy Regulation (beleidsregel), Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia

Abstract

The Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia is a public prosecutor's office located in the capital city of the Republic of Indonesia, which is directly responsible under the president and whose jurisdiction covers the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. The Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia is a state institution that exercises state power, especially in the field of prosecution. As a body that has the authority to enforce law and justice, the prosecutor's office is led by the Attorney General who is elected by and responsible to the president. The Prosecutor's Office as one of the state institutions in law enforcement is required to play a greater role in upholding the rule of law, protecting the public interest, upholding human rights, and eradicating corruption, collusion, and napotism. Restorative justice is one of the concepts of law enforcement in the settlement of cases that can be used as an instrument of recovery and has been implemented by the Supreme Court in the form of policy enforcement, but its implementation in the criminal justice system in Indonesia is still not optimal. Restorative justice is an alternative for solving criminal cases which in the mechanism of criminal justice procedures focus on punishment which is converted into a dialogue and/or mediation process involving the perpetrator and the victim to create an agreement on the settlement of criminal cases that is fair and balanced for the victims and the perpetrators themselves. . Meanwhile, according to the legal perspective, corruption is an act against the law with the intention of enriching oneself and/or other people, both individuals and corporations that can harm the state, such as bribery, extortion, embezzlement in office, fraudulent acts, conflicts of interest in procurement, and gratuities

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Maman Budiman, “Implementasi Prinsip Restorative Justice dalam Penghentian Penuntutan Perkara Korupsi Oleh Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia,” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, vol. 7, no. 2, 2022.

M. Alvi Syahrin, “Penerapan Prinsip Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu,” Majalah Hukum Nasional, 2018.

Ali Habib, “Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara,” Corruptio, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i1.2069.

Yuda Musatajab and Mulyadi A. Tajuddin, “Uang Pengganti Sebagai Alternatif Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Jurnal Restorative Justice, vol. 2, no. 1, 2018.

Wicipto Setiadi, “Korupsi Di Indonesia,” pp. 29 September–08 November, 2018.

Ruslin, “Dampak dan Upaya Pemberantasan Serta Pengawasan Korupsi di Indonesia,” vol. 1, no. 2, 2017.

Rustono Farady Marta, “Konsolidasi Gerakan Anti Korupsi Berbasis Akademisi Melalui Jurnal Integritas dan ACS 2018,” Jurnal Pengabdian dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2019.

Rida Ista Sitepu and Yusona Piadi, “Implementasi Restoratif Justice dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” 2019.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum Normatif. 2010.

Lasmauli Noverita Simarmata, “Korupsi Sekarang dan Yang Akan Datang,” vol. 11, no. 2, 2021.

Rida Ista Sitepu and Rudi Hermawan, “Pendekatan Restorative Justice Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, vol. 1, no. 3, 2019.

Darmawati, “Pengembalian Aset Kerugian Negara Perkara Korupsi Dalam Pemikiran Ius Constituendum,” Restorative Justice, vol. 4, no. 2, 2020.

Hariman Satria, “Restorative Justice: Paradigma Baru Peradilan Pidana,” Jurnal Media Hukum, vol. 25, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.18196/jmh.2018.0107.111-123.

Surat Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum, “Pedoman Restorative Justice,” 2020.

Salsabila and Slamet Tri Wahyudi, “Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menggunakan Pendekatan Restorative Justice,” Masalah-Masalah Hukum, vol. 51, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.14710/mmh.51.1.2022.61-70.

Andri Kristanto, “Kajian Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif,” vol. 7, no. 2022, pp. 180–193, 2022.

Helena Hestaria, Made Sugi Hartono, and Muhamad Jodi Setianto, “Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Rangka Penyelamatan Keuangan Negara,” Journal Komunikasi Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, vol. 5, 2022.

Pardomuan Gultom, “Analisis Sosiologi Hukum Terhadap Kemungkinan Dapat Diterapkannya Restorative Justice dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan Al-Hikmah, vol. 3, no. 1, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://ti.or.id/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-2020-korupsi-