HASIL REKAMAN SUARA SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI YANG DIMILIKI OLEH KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA

Firza Nafira  Attamimi; Hari  Soeskandi

doi:10.53363/bureau.v2i1.138

Authors

Firza Nafira Attamimi Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Hari Soeskandi Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i1.138

Keywords:

tindak pidana, rekaman suara, alat bukti, criminal acts, voice recording, evidence

Abstract

Many cases in Indonesia use voice recordings as evidence. However, many people do not understand very well whether the voice recording can be used as evidence. Voice recordings can be used as evidence depending on how to obtain them. Evidence has been regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code. However, it is not explained about the evidence in detail, especially evidence of voice recordings that use electronic media. In the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 About Changes For Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions of voice recordings has been regulated in it. But the rules are vague and not detailed. Thus it is necessary to conduct research related to the strength of sound recording evidence in solving criminal cases. The author will explain the power to validity of sound recording evidence. The research method used by the author normatively is based on the relevant Laws and Regulations. The author also uses the method of the Law and conceptual approach, and the technique of collecting legal materials taken through literature studies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afandi, A. (1986). Hukum Waris, Hukum Keluarga, dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Bakhri, S. (2012). Beban Pembuktian dalam Beberapa Praktik Peradilan. Edited by I. S. Chandranegara. Jakarta: Gramata Publishing

Fitria, R. A. (2017) “Penyadapan Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Umum Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Pidana,” Mimbar Keadilan, hal. 160–182. doi: 10.30996/mk.v0i0.2192.

Hamzah, A. (2019) Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, M. Y. (1988) Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Cet. 2. Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini.

Jeddawi, M. dan Rahman, A. (2020) “Identifikasi Hukum Adat yang Masih Berlaku dalam Penyelesaian Persoalan Sosial di Desa Kawo Kabupaten Lombok Tengah,” Jurnal Konstituen, 2(2), hal. 89–100.

Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum. Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana.

Ramelan. (2006). Hukum Acara Pidana: Teori dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Sumber Ilmu Jaya.

Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Ramelan (2006) Hukum Acara Pidana: Teori dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Sumber Ilmu Jaya.

Soeroso, R. (2011) Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Sofyan, A. M. dan Asis, A. (2017) Hukum Acara Pidana: Suatu Pengantar. Ed. 2. Diedit oleh A. Ilyas dan A. M. Muin. Jakarta: Kencana.

Subekti, R. (2008) Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Pradnya ParamitaSusanti, D. O. and Efendi, A. (2015). Penelitian Hukum. Edited by M. Sari. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik.