PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN PIDANA OLEH HAKIM TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA BAGI DIRI SENDIRI

Nesya  Warapsari; Hari  Soeskandi

doi:10.53363/bureau.v2i2.131

Authors

Nesya Warapsari Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Hari Soeskandi Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i2.131

Keywords:

Imprisonment, Rehabilitation, Narcotics, Pidana Penjara, Rehabilitasi, Narkotika

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to find out and explain about the judge’s considerations in giving penalties for Class I Narcotics Addicts, that is marijuana, which is stated in the Putusan Pengadilan No. 761/Pid/Sus/2021/PN Jmr. This paper refers to several approaches, such as case, statue, and conceptual approach, with normative research. The narcotics abuse case are resolved by providing guidance and care in the form of rehabilitation, not by imprisonment. However, in some cases, the are differences in resolving the case. The example of a narcotics abuse case that was resolved by imprisonment is the case by Mohammad Rifki Ananda, which is stated in the Putusan Pengadilan No. 761/Pid/Sus/2021/PN Jmr. The judge decide to resolved the case by imprisonment for 1 year, not by a medical or social rehabilitation. about Narcotics, in Pasal 54, states that medical and social rehabilitation are solutions that must be fulfilled by narcotics addicts and victims of narcotics abuse. Then, Undang-Undang No. 35 Tahun 2009 Pasal 103 also states that Majelis Hukum should order the defendant to take the rehabilitation as the settlement. The provision of rehabilitation for addicts and narcotics abuser is also strengthened by Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung No. 04 Tahun 2010. Thus, it can be concluded that referring to Putusan Pengadilan No. 761/Pid/Sus/2021/PN Jmr, the judge did not give consideration and attention, and did not interpret all the Ayat in Pasal 127

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dewi Rahayu, S. (2020). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika. PAMPAS: Journal Of Criminal Law, 1(1), 125-137.

Erdianti, R. N. (2017). Alternatif Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Dalam Kebijakan Kriminal Di Indonesia. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 25(2), 261-271.

Hutapea, I. (2020). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA YANG MELAKUKAN PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN I BAGI DIRI SENDIRI (Studi Putusan Nomor: 531/Pid. Sus/2019/PN. Mtr).

Jayanti, R. Analisis Yuridis Tentang Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Golongan I Bagi Diri Sendir (Studi Kasus Putusan: No. 147/Pid. SUS/2011/PN. MAROS). Dikutip dari https://core. ac. uk/download/pdf/25490331. pdf.[Diakses pada 24 Desember 2019].

LESTARI, A. A. Penjatuhan Pidana dalam Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Golongan 1 Bagi Diri Sendiri (Putusan Nomor 325/Pid. Sus/2018/PN Byw.

Najemi, A., Nawawi, K., & Purwastuti, L. (2020). Rehabilitasi Sebagai Alternatif Pemidanaan Terhadap Anak Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Dalam Upaya Perlindungan Terhadap Anak. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 4(2), 440-454.

Purnaman, A. A. B. (2018). DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN I BAGI DIRI SENDIRI (STUDI KASUS DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SLEMAN) (Doctoral dissertation, UAJY).

RAHADIAN, R. KAJIAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA BAGI DIRI SENDIRI.

Rizky, M. (2020). Penjatuhan Pidana Denda aldam Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Golongan I Bagi Diri Sendiri Berdasarkan Pasal 127 Ayat (1) Huruf A Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika (Studi Putusan Nomor 34/Pid. B/2014/PN. Dpu).

WAHYUNI, S. PENJATUHAN PIDANA OLEH HAKIM TERHADAP KORBAN PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA (Pasal 127 UU No. 35 Tahun 2009 jo SEMA No. 4 Tahun 2000) DI PENGADILAN NEGERI PONTIANAK. Jurnal Hukum Prodi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Untan (Jurnal Mahasiswa S1 Fakultas Hukum) Universitas Tanjungpura, 3(3).