DISPARITAS PUTUSAN TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA OLEH ANAK DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAM

Authors

  • Elisabeth Adisty Novena Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Hari Soeskandi Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.115

Keywords:

Narcotics, Social Rehabilitation, Medical Rehabilitation, Narkotika, Rehabilitasi Sosial, Rehabilitasi Medis

Abstract

Narcotics users can be classified in various ways, including as narcotics addicts or victims of narcotics addiction. Naltrexone users and abusers are defined as those who use or abuse narcotics to the point of becoming physically and psychologically dependent on the drugs they use. In accordance with Article 54 of the Narcotics Law, the following things occur: It is specifically stated that "narcotics addicts and victims of narcotics abuse are required to undergo medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation" and this refers to the provisions of SEMA No. 4 of 2010. Based on the Decision of the District Court of Semarang Number 407/Pid.SUS/2016/PN.Smg, the author gives examples of narcotics abusers who were ordered to undergo rehabilitation for 6 (six) months. The research method that the author uses is a normative juridical method, namely by conducting secondary data sources, namely data that are directly related to the problem being studied, and which consists of a number of data obtained from library books, laws and regulations, and others. related to the implementation of drug abuse rehabilitation programs. Following up on the research findings, the authors came to the conclusion that the legal considerations are that drug abusers must undergo medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation in addition to imprisonment. In order to reintegrate into society, one's character and morals must be examined. For drug addicts, social rehabilitation is the process of reintroducing them to society, so they don't repeat their actions. Social rehabilitation also aims to reintegrate addicts and/or drug abusers into society by restoring thought processes, emotions, and behavios that are indicators of change. They have normal personality traits and are able to interact with others in their social environment (in a rehabilitation environment).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Wahib, Pelajar Indonesia Anti Nsrkoba, Jakarta: Emir, 2006.

Abd. Basid, Dinamika, Tindak Pidana Narkotika Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, Vol 26, Nomor 4, Februari 2020.

Adami Chazawi, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana I; Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori-Teori Pemidanaan & Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.

Andra, J. (2020). DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI BANGKINANG. Jurnal Panji Keadilan?: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.36085/jpk.v3i2.1198. (n.d.).

Devy Iryanthy Hasibuan,Disparitas Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika, USU Law Journal, Vol.3.No.1 (April 2015).

Eva Achjani Zulfa, Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan. Depok: UI Press.2011.

Fitriani Toliango, Disparitas Pemidanaan Penyalah Guna Narkotika,e-Jurnal katalogis, Vol. 4 No.11, November 2016.

Gadis Arivia. (2005). Potret Buram Eksploitasi Kekerasan Seksual pada Anak. Ford Foundation. (n.d.).

Hasan Alwi, dkk, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Balai Pustaka, 2002.

Hasibuan, M. R., Maskufa, M., & Nasution, H. (2021). Pertanggung Jawaban Hukum Anak Terhadap Tindak Pidana (Studi Komparasi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri). JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v2i2.18757. (n.d.).

Manurung, F., Syahrin, A., Ablisar, M., & Sunarmi, S. (2021). DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI RANTAUPRAPAT (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO. 159/PID.SUS/2019/PN.RAP DAN PUTUSAN NO. 626/PID.SUS/2020/PN.RA. (n.d.).

M. Irfan Islamy. Perumusan Kebijaksanaan Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.1992.

Muladi, Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat, Bandung: Alumni, 2008.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Pidana dan Pemidanaan, Bandung: Alumni, 2010.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi, Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Bandung: Alumni, 1998.

Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2015.

Moh. Taufik Makarao, dkk, (2005) Tindak Pidana Narkotika, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

M. Syamsudin, Konstruksi Baru Budaya Hukum Hakim Berbasis Hukum Progresif, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2012.

P.A.F Lamintang, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Cetakan Pertama, Sinar Grafika, 2014.

Panji Keadilan, Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Bangkinang, Vol 3, Nomor 2, Juli 2020.

Pradhita Rika Nagara. Pertimbangan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Anak Yang Melakukan Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, 2015.

Putra, A. A. N. R. A., Sepud, I. M., & Sujana, I. N. (2020). Disparitas Putusan Hakim dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.2.1884.129-135. (n.d.).

R. Wiyono, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Siswanto S, Politik Hukum Dalam Undang-Undang Narkotika, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2012.

Tami Rusli, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Bandar Lampung: Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL) Press, 2017.

Yusti Probowati Rahayu, Di Balik Putusan Hakim (Kajian Psikologi Hukum Dalam Perkara Pidana). Sidoarjo, Citra Media, 2005.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-07

How to Cite

Novena, E. A. ., & Soeskandi, H. . (2022). DISPARITAS PUTUSAN TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA OLEH ANAK DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAM. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 2(3), 1185–1213. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.115