TINJAUAN YURIDIS PEMBERIAN REMISI BAGI NARAPIDANA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DAN PSIKOTROPIKA DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 1995 TENTANG PEMASYARAKATAN : Studi di LAPAS Klas IIA Serang

Sigit  Kamseno

doi:10.53363/bureau.v2i2.105

Authors

Sigit Kamseno Universitas Primagraha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i2.105

Keywords:

Pemasyarakatan, Psikotropika, Narkotika, Remisi, Correctional, Psychotropics, Narcotics, Remission

Abstract

Rights of prisoners stipulated in the Law No. 12 of 1995 concerning on correctional. In article 14, it is explicity mentioned some prisoners rights including the right to get remission. The implementation of the entitlement remissions for the prisoners of narcotics and psychotropic crimes and certain criminal offenses categorized as extra ordinary crime regulated in The Government Regulation No. 99 of 2012 on the second amandement of the Goverment Regulation No. 32 of 1999 on the requirement and procedures for the implementation of the prisoners rights. In this government regulation, remission for the prisoners of narcotics and psychotropic cases and specific criminal acts enforced differently from other general crimes. Policy about tightening these remissions raise the pro and contra in the society. In the one hand, those who agree on the policy argue that the perpretactors of narcotics and psychotropic cases are not feasible to be given remission, because narcotics and psychotropic are extra ordinary crimes. This can evoke deterrent effect. On the other hand, people whose counter with this policy assume that remission is a right of prisoners that have been regulated by laws. Restrictions remissions by tightening of the requirement for prisoners of certain criminal acts are form discrimination that violated human rights. This research aim are finding out on the the implementation of remission in Prison of Serang and how it is answered based on human right perspective. This research is a normative legsl research bu using a qualitative method. Collecting data with interview with The official of Prison Serang and some narcotics prisoners. The result of this research concludes that remission for the prisoners of certain criminal acts categorized as a extra ordinary crime including the narcotics and psychotropic cases enforced differently regulated specifically in the Government Regulation No.99 of 2012 in addition to meet the requirement of good behavior, inmates must also have been serving a criminal sentence of more than 6 (six) months, must also be willing to cooperate with law inforcement to help dismantle the criminal case that done by them, also should have paid the full of compensation in accordance with the court decision. Remission is a fundamental rights that must be granted. And the prison of Serang have been conduct the implementation for the prisoners of narcotics and psychotropic based on Law No.12 of 1995. There is no discriminatory treatment for the prisoners to get their rights for remissions. The implementation of remission rights in Prison of Serang is not violated against the human rights

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adi Sujatno dan Didin Sudirman,2008, Pemasyarakatan Menjawab Tantangan Zaman Jakarta, Velas Produksi, Humas Ditjen Pemasyarakatan.

Adi Sujatno,2002, Negara Tanpa Penjara (Sebuah Renungan), Jakarta, Montas

Adami Chazawi,2008 Hukum Pidana Bagian I Jakarta, PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Andi Hamzah,1994, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Jakarta, Rhineka Cipta

Andrey Sujatmoko, 2015 Hukum HAM dan Hukum Humaniter. PT Raja Grafindo, Jakarta

Azhari,2003 Negara Hukum Kencana, Jakarta

Bambang Margono,2004, Bimbingan Karir dan Pekerjaan Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan Jakarta, Modul Departemen Hukum dan HAM RI.

Dwidja Priyatno,2006 Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara di Indonesia Bandung, Rafika Utama.

Dahlan Thaib,1996 Kedaulatan Rakyat Negara Hukum dan Hak-hak Asasi Manusia, Media Pratama, Jakarta.

Harsono HS 1995, Sistem Baru Pembinaan Narapidana Jakarta, Djambasan.

Leden Marpaung,2009, Asas Teori Praktik Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Muhammad Erwin,2011 Filsafat Hukum Refleksi Kritis terhadap Hukum, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

Moeljatno,1982, Azas-azas Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta, FH UGM

Ni’matul Huda,2005, Negara Hukum Demokrasi dan Judicial Review, UII Press, Yogjakarta,

Padmo Wahyono,1982, Konsep Negara Hukum Republik Indonesia, Rajawali, Jakarta.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2008, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Jakarta, Kencana

Petrus Panjaitan dan Simorangkir Pandapotan,1995, Lembaga Pemasyarakatan dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Jakarta; Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Romdoni, M. (2022). The Reconstitution of Death Criminal Imposition against Persons of Criminal Actions on Narcotics Post-Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007. LEGAL BRIEF, 11(2), 508–519. Retrieved from http://legal.isha.or.id/index.php/legal/article/view/154

Romdoni, M., & Karomah, A. (2021). Perbandingan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy) Terhadap Kejahatan Narkotika Atau Dadah (Studi Komparatif Indonesia Dan Malaysia). Al Qisthas: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik Ketatanegaraan, 12(1), 118-138. doi:10.37035/alqisthas.v12i1.4883

Satijpto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang

Soedarto,1990, Hukum Pidana I (Semarang, Yayasan Soedarto d/a Fakultas Hukum UNDIP,

Soedikno Mertokusumo, 2003, Mengenal Hukum, Yogyakarta, Liberty 2003

Teguh Sulistia, dan Aris Arzeti,2011, Hukum Pidana Horison Baru Pasca Reformasi, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

Untung Sugiyono,2009, Kedudukan Pemasyarakatan Dalam Sistem Penegakkan Hukum (Komisi Yudisial RI), Jakarta.